SportsPicks
Politics • Investing & Finance • Sports
All your sports information for those investing Vegas-style in the outcomes of sports games. Predicting games against the line in all sports, especially football, American and English style.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

European Football Review 3rd-5th November 2026

Lots happening in this week's European competitions so let's begin.

Manchester United 3-2 Roma
An astonishing game which initially looked like it was aligning well with my pre game projections and then took a sharp twist. In the first half, Roma's aggressive man orientated press caused United a lot of problems and Roma opened the scoring early on attack the space behind an out of position Diogo Dalot. Roma added a second from a penalty soon afterwards after a very needless handball from Ayden Heaven. Roma stayed on top for the rest of the half but didn't press hard for a third goal. In the second half, United played more aggressively and positioned their players to challenge Roma players receiving the ball. Gian Piero Gasperini made substitutions to contest the game more physically but it came at the expense of Roma's technical control over the game. United pulled one back from a penalty before two late goals completed the comeback.

This is the second two goal lead Roma have thrown away for a loss in the Champions League this season and managing leads has been something of a curse for them going back a long time across different teams and managers. What really stands out is that when the game changes, it is not that Roma doesn't adapt, it's they make the wrong adaption. Against Real Madrid, the three late goals they conceded were from balls crossed into the box which they were not equipped to defend. They appear to be lacking the ability to take the sting out of the game and make the trailing team do the lead, the Pep Guardiola's Man City or Spain under Luis De La Fuente. Any team that ever had Andrea Pirlo in it could do the same. This is a major cause for concern that I will have to consider when giving out picks on them. I believe they should still be good for first half picks but full game picks they are a candidate for cash out and the signal I would be looking for is them departing from their pressure and possession methods.

I did anticipate that this would be a transition heavy game with opportunities at both ends and so both teams to score and the over I believe did represent value. I am surprised that United of all teams in their downward ebb would find the means to comeback from that but maybe I should not have been quite so surprised. I thought that the collapse against Real Madrid may have been an outlier. Even a dysfunctional United still maintains a lot of transition threat and physicality to turn a game into a contest. Roma will now face a struggle just to qualify for the playoff round.

Barcelona 3-0 Aston Villa
Despite the scoreline and the manner of the goals, this was a game where Unai Emery had a very specific tactical gameplan that looked to be working quite effectively at times. Aston Villa tried to bait Barcelona's press and then play through it. They positioned their offensive players in such a way to threaten the space behind Barcelona's defence and behind their midfield at the same time. Rodri's presence was able to mitigate that threat but Aston Villa were lacking a little bit of transition threat to make Barcelona pay. Barcelona created chances from high pressure and their opening goal came from Lamine Yamal pouncing on a loose pass across defence and finishing the chance. From a chance creation perspective this game was closer than the scoreline suggested, with Barcelona having modest chance creation by their standards and Aston Villa having generated some decent opportunities of their own.

I had Aston Villa to cover the spread and despite what we saw I think that line was still a bit too high and so I would see some value on Villa. I do think that the over and both teams to score were too aggressively priced and so I would see this as a spot where there was some value on the under. The prescient point is that Emery set up Aston Villa to play very tactically and Barcelona had enough at the back to make the transition opportunities difficult.

Atlético Madrid 0-2 Bayern Munich
This game was a little bit of a misfire for Atlético Madrid as Bayern Munich were able to keep the pressure on them for the whole game and although Atlético defended well for long stretches, they struggled to find a consistent outlet for their attacks. When Bayern lost the ball they were effective in winning it back quickly and they always had options to stretch Atlético's back line. The opening goal came from a Robin Le Normand error and it's mare from the first he's made this season. Some fans have remarked that he has not been as consistent defensively since his head injury and that he along with Clément Lenglet have not been reliable enough to start consistently in the big games. Atlético already had some injuries going into the game and Diego Simeone's substitutions did help them to compete a bit but Ademola Lookman still looks badly bereft of confidence and Álex Baena and Alexander Sørloth did not look on the same wavelength. The return of Koke as a substitute is a boost for Atlético but with a home game at the top of the table against Barcelona coming up, the performance against Bayern raises big concerns for Atlético's ability to find a way through the relentless pressure of Barcelona.

https://www.intothecalderon.com/atletico-madrid-columns/29541/atletico-de-madrid-0-2-bayern-munich-takeaways-champions-league-simeone-le-normand

Feyenoord 0-3 Inter Milan
Cristian Chivu's side bounced back from a disappointing derby day loss to defeat Feyenoord in a game in which Inter consistently found space in behind Feyenoord's pressing structure. Feyenoord were able to launch attacks but they struggled to advance through multiple phases. Club Brugge employed a high intensity press against Inter Milan and were able to consistently find space on Inter's back flanks, which Inter's structure struggled to keep tight while they attacked. Feyenoord were not able to access that space quite so easily and so they did not generate the same chances as Club Brugge. From a chance creation perspective this game was a fair bit closer than the scoreline suggested, enough that it might imply some value on Feyenoord in this game. But Inter led from an early point and so Inter were managing a lead for most of the game, Inter's chance creation profile looks very different when they go behind.

Fenerbahçe 3-2 Liverpool
Despite Fenerbahçe's struggles, their former player Dirk Kuyt led them to a 3-2 win over Liverpool, the club he spent years of his career with as a player. before he signed for Fenerbahçe as a player. Liverpool were favoured by a goal going into this game despite having a very week European record in Turkey (funnily enough their one win was against Trabzonspor in 2010 and the winning goal was scored by Dirk Kuyt). As is not uncommon for teams in the Turkish Süper Lig, Fenerbahçe had some players signed on big money from mainland Europe, such as Romelu Lukaku and N'Golo Kante. Liverpool took the lead from a deflection before Fenerbahçe hit the crossbar and equalised from a deflected free kick. The two teams exchanged blows in the second half before Fenerbahçe scored the winner. This was a game in which Fenerbahçe were able match Liverpool's intensity and take the initiative for the win. This kind of intensity is a recurring pattern in Turkish teams at home in Europe, especially against English teams. I would say there was good value on Fenerbahçe in this matchup and their chance creation was close to Liverpool's.

Slavia Praha 1-2 Arsenal
The first half of this game looked like a typical low volatility Arsenal game where they grind out a lead and then grind out the game. At half time Arsenal were 2-0 up and Slavia Praha had only one shot, not on target. The second half was a very different game as Slavia went with three centre backs and pushed the rest of the team to press Arsenal. This helped Slavia to compete more effectively with Arsenal and disrupt their passing. Slavia had a lot of chances and despite not scoring until the 90th minute, their chance creation exceeded Arsenal's over the course of the game. Normally Arsenal are able to withstand a physical high pressure style but the switch to three at the back is a very interesting tactical decision that has implications for the failure modes of Arsenal's strategy.

Crystal Palace 1-1 Hoffenheim
Crystal Palace's struggles this season continue, once again to a high pressing team that was able to maintain pressure throughout the game. If Oliver Glasner were still there they may have been able to hurt Hoffenheim on the counter even with the departures from Palace's squad but the vision for Palace under Pierre Sage still is not quite clear. Despite all this, it was not an entirely disappointing result for Palace as they did find an equaliser after going down to ten men. Since Palace were favoured by over half a goal going into this game, I think the value was on Hoffenheim.

AZ Alkmaar 1-2 Juventus
Juventus were able to exploit the space behind Alkmaar's press and this helped them to build a two goal lead in the first half. Alkmaar struggled to create clear cut chances at first but as the second half progressed they got into more and more dangerous positions and they were unlucky not to pull a goal back until very late, when there was little time left to find an equaliser. From a chance creation perspective, Juventus did not create a lot for two goals and Feyenoord may consider themselves slightly unlucky to be 2-0 down at half time. Game management has not been a consistent strength for Juventus this season and on another night they may well have paid for the chances given up. Since they were favoured by half a goal going into this game, I think there may have been some value on Feyenoord, even after accounting for the divergence in chance creation you can see when one team spends most of the game defending a two goal lead.

FC Thun 3-1 Heart of Midlothian
Hearts' injuries were a major problem for them and FC Thun's aggressive pressure helped them disrupt their buildup and find space in behind their defence. Although Hearts had more possession, FC Thun were more effective at attacking quickly after regaining possession of the ball. Chance creation was closer than the 3-1 score implied but it was still clear enough that it did support some value on FC Thun.

We are halfway through the league phase of the Champions League, Europa League and Conference League. Each game from here on in brings more and more clarity to the final picture.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Crick's CFP Rankings
00:06:11
Barnes Brothers: European Soccer Preview
00:54:00
Master Class: Prediction Markets vs Sportsbooks

In this edition of "Master Class", we're gonna look at Prediction Markets vs Sportsbooks, and why the Prediction Markets are the Future of Sports Betting!! Come join us, as we try to provide you with all the tools to STACK YOUR NICKELS TO THE CEILING!! Feel Free to drop any questions you have in the comments!! Hope This Helps My Friends!! Good Luck, Good Gamblin, & Have The Day You Deserve!!

-Crickett

00:51:21
SEC Preview Podcast

A full breakdown of every team in the SEC, including talent analysis, coordinator concern, and schedule forecasts, with win total expectations. Enjoy!

SEC Preview Podcast
Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB

March Madness final four recap and Championship preview...

Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
Live Chat
2026 New Live Chat

Per popular demand.

The College Football Show: Episode 10 "Is This The GREATEST Weekend Of College Football EVER?!?!" (11/7/26)

ANY PICKS MADE IN THIS SHOW ARE NOT SPORTSPICKS "OFFICIAL PICKS"

START TIME - 10:00 AM EST

placeholder

Premier League 6th of November 2026 - My Pick

1% Everton vs Coventry City over 9.5 corners at 50c (good to 53c)

Just a brief one for you ahead of the game between Everton and Coventry City beginning shortly. These are both very physical teams that play a lot of crosses into the box and both present a threat from set pieces. Everton have been playing more aggressively under David Moyes than they have been in previous seasons, being willing to press higher up the pitch and compete for second balls before their opponent has a chance to play it into midfield. Coventry's corner count has not been the highest but I think part of this is Coventry under Frank Lampard start out more technically orientated trying to control the game but they have been quite pragmatic in the Premier League this season. They have not generated the most corners but they have spent quite a while in games defending. Against an opponent like Everton that is set piece heavy themselves, both teams have outlets to ...

September 14, 2026
post photo preview
Barnes Betting Report: Monday Night Football
Chiefs-Broncos
 
REB Power Ratings
CHIEFS: 7 points better than average
BRONCOS 3 points better than average
Home edge for KC: +2.5
REB Spread: Chiefs by 6.5
REB Moneyline: Chiefs 67%
REB Total: 41
PFF Talent: Favors Chiefs on both sides of the ball
 
Situational Analysis
Coaching: Reid is one of the best ever as is Spags, whereas Payton gives up playcalling for the Broncos and Joseph has had some erratic spots in his career. 
Key Market Trends: Chiefs as 3 points or less: 70% cover rate; Reid has a 65% success rate against the spread in week 1; Nix average QB rating on road is 85 while Mahomes exceeds 100 at home; Denver’s offense against top-5 defenses on the road scores a median of 17 points while Chiefs offense under Mahomes is 27. Public tickets favor the Broncos by a 2 to 1 margin. 
 
Talent according to PFF
Players I expect to have 70+ ratings this season, using PFF's past season grades and match for scheme...
 
Chiefs Defense
CB SNEED
CB WILLIAMS
S ROLAND-WALLACE
S GILMAN
LB TRANQUILL 
LB BOLTON
LB COLTRANE
DE KARLAFTIS
DT JONES
 
Broncos Offense
LT BOLLES
RG MEINERZ
RT MCGLICNHEY
TE ENGRAM
WR WADDLE
WR SUTTON
QB NIX
 
Chiefs Offense
C HUMPHREY
G SMITH
WR WORTHY
WR RICE
RB WALKER
QB MAHOMES
TE KELCE
 
Broncos Defense
S HUFANGA
CB SURTAIN
DE BONITTO
DT JONES
DE ELLISS
 

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
Forecasting the Senate in 2026

Two conflicting trends dictate the Senate outcome in 2026. The map heavily favors Republicans, as the competitive Senate seats up lean heavily Republican. By contrast, the election context heavily favors Democrats, with war, recession, realignment and scandal tipping in their direction. A deeper dive reveals why prediction markets still likely undersell Democratic prospects.

First, the idea that Senate midterms favor the party out of power in the White House is belied by both recent and a century of history of Senate elections. Unlike the House, only a third of Senate seats face election in any midterm, and that map dictates outcomes unless the election context is particularly bad for the incumbent party.

Consider that the highly unpopular Biden didn’t lost any net Senate seats in 2022 and Trump added Senate seats in the Democratic friendly cycle in 2018. Equally, Clinton didn’t lose net Senate seats in 1998 nor did W. in 2002. Even low-approval election cycles like 1966 and 1982 didn’t produce a big swing in the Senate. Indeed, since 1934, the party in power only lost 10% or more of their Senate seats (4+) less than half of the time. Democrats need a flip of exactly that — at least 4 Senate seats — to retake power in the Senate.

Then take a look at the map, and you can see the reason for optimism in GOP circles and some traders in the prediction markets. Only 2 GOP-held seats are in states Trump won by less than double digits, while 2 Democratic-held seats are in states Trump won, and one of those GOP held seats features a long-time incumbent who typically runs double-digits ahead of the GOP norm (Collins in Maine). This is why the GOP entered the year believing odds of losing the Senate were remote, and the prediction markets mostly concurred.

But this ignores the counter-trend: the degree of election dismay with the incumbent party in the White House, and the reasons for that dismay. Presidential job approval has not been a neat proxy for Senate midterms because it depends on the reason for that dissatisfaction in the electorate. Four factors drive Senatorial midterms: war, recession/cost of living, realignment, and scandal. When two of those four factors are not present and don’t dominate, then the incumbent party’s odds of losing 4+ Senate seats drops to less than 20%. By contrast, when two of those four factors are present and do predominate, then the odds of the incumbent party losing 4+ Senate seats rises to 100%. Indeed, the median number of Senate seats lost when some combination of war, recession, realignment and scandal, are present, the White House party loses at least 8 Senate seats.

A few examples: while FDR added Senate seats in 1934 midterms, he lost 9 in 1938 midterms due to the combination of recession and scandal (trying to stack SCOTUS). 1942 and 1946 gave us war and recession to cost Democrats 8 and 12 Senate seats alike. 1950 gave us war again and scandals concerning the war costing Democrats 5 Senate seats. 1958 gave us recession and scandal, costing Ike 15 Senate seats. While JFK added Senate seats in 1962 and Nixon added Senate seats in 1970, only Watergate and stagflation in 1974 or the combination of Iran Contra and vulnerable class of 1980 incumbents cost the incumbent party 4 or more Senate seats until the realignment election of 1994, where evangelicals shifted their down-ballot voting to the GOP en masse. It took war and scandal in 2006 to see the Senate switch 4+ Senate seats again.

That’s the story of 2026: a very GOP favorable Senate map versus a very Democratic friendly election cycle. The GOP enters election season with all four factor present: war, recession/cost of living, realignment, and scandal. The Iran War was already deeply unpopular, and it’s impact on the economy in gas and diesel prices turns Americans sour on their current economic prospects, as wages fall behind, housing and health care feel increasingly unaffordable, labor force participation continues to drop, the the mirage of AI keeps the GDP just above a technical recession. The Epstein scandal remains one of the worst scandals in American political history, and Trump managed to associate himself deeply with the scandal in his handling of it. Then the realignment, as the new Trump 2024 voters joined the Obama-Trump converts of 2016 in abandoning GOP identity, already evident in surveys and primary participation.

A quintet of voter groups appear to be realigning away from the Republican brand — hispanic voters, black voters, industrial area voters, libertarian-leaning voters, and war-skeptical voters alike. This realigning electorate shows up disproportionately in key Senate contests. The war-skeptical voters in states like Maine, New Hampshire, Ohio, Michigan, Iowa, Montana, Nebraska, and Alaska (these are the states W failed to gain in between 2000 and 2004 due to the Iraq War before it even turned unpopular). The hispanic voters in states like Florida and Texas. The African-American voters in states like North Carolina and Georgia. The industrial voters in Ohio and Michigan. The libertarian leaving voters in states like New Hampshire, Alaska, Texas and Florida.

Thus, many of the states that seem “Safe” on the map are anything but, as their realigning electorates shift back against the Republican brand, with all of them having recent histories in electoral cycles of favoring Democrats or being true swing states. Take states like Florida and Texas where suburban margins began to erode for the GOP in the Trump era but countered that by massive margin shifts in hispanic and black precincts. Primary participation, voter identification, and public opinion surveys show those black and hispanic voters shifting back massively away from the GOP brand, which, given the erosion in some suburban areas and losses with younger generations, makes states Florida and Texas closer to competitive than double-digit leans.

In big swing election cycles, even “safe” Senate seats can suddenly turn razor close, as Bob Dole found out in 1974, barely holding on to his Kansas seat before being the VP nominee two years later. Strong independent candidates in Kansas, Nebraska, South Dakota and Montana may pose a unique threat to GOP held seats, as the Nebraska race in 2024 showed, with Osborn running 17 points ahead of Harris’ margin in the state. Democrats field the much better candidate in Ohio with a proven track record of out-performing Democratic margins in the state, while the Texas GOP nominee faces abandonment from his own party after they spent over $100M bashing him in the state for a disliked party incumbent. Alaska primary results suggest the Democratic nominee already holds the edge in that ranked choice voting state, while the famed cross-over support for Collins in Maine appears to be fading with newer generations taking over the voter rolls. My current map would be as follows, with surprising closer-than-expected races in Montana, Kansas, Louisiana, Florida, Mississippi, South Dakota, South Carolina and Kentucky, and a median map of Democrats holding 53+ Senate seats after the 2026 elections.


 

If past is prologue, the map won’t save the GOP in 2026, and an ever bigger tsunami may be incoming than anyone in Washington expects.

Read full Article
post photo preview
OFFICIAL PICKS: Midterms, 2026
House Elections Projections
 
The House tends to be more responsive to midterm dynamics, but, like the Senate, swings hard in elections where some combination of the Four Factors are present -- cost of living crisis or recession; war; major scandal; betrayal or down-ballot realignment. A fun map to use is this simulator, which takes partisan averages from existing models, and plugs in the map based on your adjustment of the generic ballot edge for one party or another. https://globalelectionsimulator.com/#/usa-house
 
Historic Norms: When a combination of the Four Factors are present, this is the kind of swing you get:
1930: 52 seat swing
1946: 55 seat swing
1958: 49 seat swing
1974: 49 seat swing
1994: 54 seat swing
2006: 31 seat swing
 
2026 PROJECTIONS

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals