SportsPicks
Politics • Investing & Finance • Sports
All your sports information for those investing Vegas-style in the outcomes of sports games. Predicting games against the line in all sports, especially football, American and English style.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
Nebraska Illinois Recap

Overview: While English Premier League made enough profits to survive any luck in Champagne, it was something to watch Nebraska manage to recapture bad luck in a bottle like last year's game in Lincoln against the Illini, and make you wonder what football gods Scott Frost offended in taking the job in his school of origin. Nebraska outgunned Illinois in the air, on the ground, in total yards, in yards per play, and the metrics best predictive of college football, yet lost. How? Two missed extra points, a called back INT, a safety based on a questionable call, a fumble recovery for Illinois in a TD seconds before the end of the half, a punt that magically landed at the half-yard line, as Illinois managed 21 offensive points, and 7 of that came on the penalty-laden drive that reversed an INT at midfield.

Inside the Stat Sheet: While most metrics would have Nebraska winning most of the time, there was one big risk area for the Huskers: an underwhelming offensive performance, with QB Martinez missing multiple open receivers, including for open touchdowns, the short-yardage passing game struggling, and the running game stuffed. Illinois' offense averaged a mere 4.9 yards per play, which usually results in a sub-20 points offensive output, and may have benefited from the one bad-luck play of their side of the ball -- replacing Peters with Rutgers transfer Sitkowski, the latter a better fit for Bielema's boys. The promising defensive play in the ex-Missouri DC provides promise on that side of the ball for the Illini, though Nebraska's big plays featured its one traditional vulnerability -- big plays in the man-heavy defense.

Early Future Forecast: for the rest of the season shows Scott Frost on a very hot, hot seat in Lincoln, needing Martinez to steady his hand at QB, while the rest of the unit proved promising on both sides of the ball. Great start for Bielema, even if luck played the ultimate tipping factor, but his success will likely depend on facing weak run defenses and offenses that lack big-play ability in the passing game especially. Watch for betting opportunities if the public over-reacts to Nebraska's loss and Illinois' win in the next few weeks, as most bettors rarely look past the score in the box score to assess the future of both teams.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Barnes Brothers: World Cup Preview - Part 2
01:03:49
Barnes Brothers MEGA World Cup Preview
01:57:40
Barnes Brothers Do It Again!!!!

What if someone would have told you that Tottenham Spurs would AVOID RELEGATION by the "skin of their teeth"??

Would You Listen?!?!

IF YOU DIDN'T..... NEXT TIME YOU WILL BECAUSE ALL THE BARNES BROTHERS DO IS WIN BABY WIN!!!!

00:08:15
SEC Preview Podcast

A full breakdown of every team in the SEC, including talent analysis, coordinator concern, and schedule forecasts, with win total expectations. Enjoy!

SEC Preview Podcast
Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB

March Madness final four recap and Championship preview...

Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
LIVE CHAT FOR 2026

Now open!

World Cup Semi Finals England vs Argentina - My Picks

0.5% Over 2.5 goals at 39c (good to 44c)
0.5% Both teams to score at 52c (good to 56c)
(Optional) 0.5% Game to go to penalties at 19c (good to 22c)

The second semi final will begin shortly between England and Argentina. This will be a fiery semi final as the two countries have a historical football rivalry going back to the 1980s when Diego Maradona scored his infamous "Hand of God" goal before going an mazy run to score one of the all time World Cup goals. It was a tense matchup even back then due to the military conflict between England and Argentina. This conflict may go back to before many fans were born but there is certainly no love lost between these teams when it comes to football.

England made it to the semi final with an athletic, transition based system under Thomas Tuchel. This has been effective against opponents who play more openly, such as Croatia and Mexico while struggling more against opponents who are able to ...

post photo preview
OFFICIAL PICKS: Midterms, 2026
House Elections Projections
 
The House tends to be more responsive to midterm dynamics, but, like the Senate, swings hard in elections where some combination of the Four Factors are present -- cost of living crisis or recession; war; major scandal; betrayal or down-ballot realignment. A fun map to use is this simulator, which takes partisan averages from existing models, and plugs in the map based on your adjustment of the generic ballot edge for one party or another. https://globalelectionsimulator.com/#/usa-house
 
Historic Norms: When a combination of the Four Factors are present, this is the kind of swing you get:
1930: 52 seat swing
1946: 55 seat swing
1958: 49 seat swing
1974: 49 seat swing
1994: 54 seat swing
2006: 31 seat swing
 
2026 PROJECTIONS

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Barnes Betting Report: Senate 2026

First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.

Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe. 

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Barnes Betting Report: Massie Deep Dive
Based on historic turnout patterns in contested GOP primaries, early voting to date, and a range of polling sources, this is my updated set of forecasts for the Kentucky 4th Congressional District GOP primary. 
 

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals