From today through New Years...
EPL
WOLVES -120 WATFORD
EVERTON +1/2 BURNLEY
NORWICH +1 ARSENAL
SOUTHAMPTON +1/2 WEST HAM
CHELSEA -140 ASTON VILLA
BRENTFORD +1/2 BRIGHTON
NEWCASTLE +1 MANU
WOLVES +1/2 ARSENAL
SOUTHAMPTON +1/2 TOTTENHAM
LEEDS +1/2 ASTON VILLA
LEICESTER +1 LIVERPOOL
BRENTFORD +2 MAN CITY
EVERTON -110 NEWCASTLE
ARSENAL +520 MANCITY
CHELSEA-LIVERPOOL DRAW +245
NFL
TN +3 ½ SAN FRAN
CLE-GB OVER 44
ARI -110 IND
CAR +11 TB
CAR-TB OVER 44
1H NYG +6 PHI
NYG-PHI OVER 40 ½
HOU +10 LAC
LAC UNDER 27 ½
BUF-NE OVER 43 ½
BUF OVER 20 ½
MN +3 LAR
NYJ -110 JAX
1H CHI +4 SEA
SEA UNDER 24 ½
KC -7 PIT
KC-PIT OVER 44
LV -110 DEN
LV-DEN OVER 41 ½
1H WASH +6 ½ DAL
1H LV +5 IND
NYJ +11 TB
1H ATL +7 ½ BUF
1H CAR +4 NO
WASH +3 PHI
CIN +4 KC
1H JAX +10 NE
1H DEN +4 LAC
1H HOU +8 SF
1H DET +6 SEA
BAL +3 LAR
🔥 August 7 Degenerate Special 🔥
Zack Wheeler Over 5.5 Ks (-164) is the clearest individual strikeout prop on the entire slate.
Elite Tier arm (10.8 K/9) projects ~7.1 strikeouts tonight. The 5.5 is pure floor — he clears it the overwhelming majority of the time even when limited. Highest projected strength gap vs any posted line today.
Safe. High-conviction. Locked.
#MLBProps #StrikeoutBets #DegenerateMode
First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.
Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe.