These are not Sportspicks "Recommended Picks"
Well we've already got to see plenty of Golf early on this Sunday mornin, with the conclusion of the Third Round at Augusta. After inclement weather, once again, halted play on Saturday afternoon... Play resumed early Sunday, and this edition of "The Masters" is shaping up to be a very good one down the stretch!! Brooks Koepka and Jon Rahm are playing some EXCEPTIONAL Golf!! However, as in ANY Major, it's still ANYONE'S Tournament headed into the Final Round. Koepka was one of our "Pre-Tournament" picks to win this thing at +4000 odds!! So.... COME ON BROOKSY!!!! We also have some other "Future's" still alive, and we've faired decently so far with our individual round "Matchups" as well... We NEED a BIG TIME Sunday, so we can close this thing out with a BANG and cash a REAL NICE PAYDAY!!!!
The Masters Results 4/8/23
2-Ball (Heads Up) Matchups
Outright Winners
C. Morikawa -110 vs J. Spieth
V. Hovland -120 vs S. Burns
Outright Losers
S. Lowry -150 vs R. Henley
C. Young +100 vs J. Day
Tie Resulting In "No Bet" (Push)
S.W. Kim +110 vs M. Homa Both Shot Even Par in Round 3
J. Rose -155 vs G. Woodland Both Shot 1-Over Par in Round 3
B. Koepka +130 vs J. Rahm Both Shot 1-Over Par in Round 3
3-Ball (3-Way Group) Matchups
Outright Winners
H. Matsuyama +140 vs M. Fitzpatrick vs H. English
C. Young +180 vs J. Spieth vs S. Burns
V. Hovland +210 vs C. Morikawa vs J. Day
Outright Losers
R. Fox +185 vs P. Reed vs K. H. Lee P. Reed Won Group
S. Lowry +150 vs J. Rose vs R. Henley R. Henley Won Group
Tie Resulting In Smaller Payout
Koepka & Rahm Both Shot 1-Over Par in Round 3 To Tie This Group
Six Shooter (6-Way Group) Matchups
Outright Losers
R. Henley Won Group
V. Hovland Won Group
Crick's Picks: The Masters 4/9/23
2-Ball (Heads Up) Matchups
Full "Unit Bet" Recommended For These Picks
R. Fox -105 vs T. Moore 12:58 PM EST
H. English -110 vs H. Varner III 1:27 PM EST
T. Gooch -120 vs T. Pieters 1:46 PM EST
C. Morikawa -275 vs S. Bennett 2:05 PM EST
H. Matsuyama -160 vs R. Henley 2:14 PM EST
2-Ball (3-Way) Matchups
In "2-Ball (3-way)" you can select "Tie" as an option... Understand that when a "Tie" option is offered, you will now LOSE your bet if you bet on a select player and then that player shoots the same score as his opponent.
Full "Unit Bet" Recommended For These Picks Unless "Tie" Is Selected
If "Tie" is selected... Only 25% (or less) Of "Unit Bet" Recommended
C. Smith -175 vs S. Straka 12:49 PM EST
P. Mickelson & J. Spieth To Tie +850 12:49 PM EST
T. Fleetwood -120 vs A. Ancer 12:58 PM EST
S. W. Kim +120 vs S. Burns 1:08 PM EST
J. Niemann +125 vs C. Young 1:17 PM EST
G. Woodland & J. Day To Tie +700 1:36 PM EST
J. Rose +115 vs S. Lowry 1:46 PM EST
X. Schauffele -135 vs P. Reed 1:55 PM EST
P. Cantlay -115 vs V. Hovland 2:24 PM EST
B. Koepka +180 vs J. Rahm 2:33 PM EST
Six Shooter (6-Way Group) Matchups
Only 50% (or less) Of "Unit Bet" Recommended For These Picks
H. Matsuyama +500 vs J. Rahm, P. Cantlay, V. Hovland, B. Koepka, R. Henley
C. Morikawa +330 vs X. Schauffele, S. Lowry, P. Reed, J. Rose, G. Woodland
Favorite Props For Final Round
Only 25% (or less) Of "Unit Bet" Recommended For These Picks
P. Cantlay To Have Bogey Free Round +1200
X. Schauffele To Have Bogey Free Round +1400
S. Scheffler To Make An Eagle In Final Round +450
B. Koepka To Make An Eagle In Final Round +450
Will There Be A Playoff? YES +300
To Finish Top 10
Full "Unit Bet" Recommended For These Picks
C. Morikawa -150
X. Schauffele +120
S. Scheffler +120
P. Reed +180
To Finish Top 20
Only 50% (or less) Of "Unit Bet" Recommended For These Picks
K. H. Lee +190
Sahith Theegala +220
Scott Stallings +300
Si Woo Kim +360
Pre-Tourney "Future's" Bets Still Alive
Tournament Winner
B. Koepka +4000
C. Morikawa +2200
J. Day +2500
To Finish Top 5
B. Koepka +800
T. Finau +400
To Finish Top 10
S. Scheffler -150
T. Finau +190
C. Morikawa +210
Enjoy The Final Round and GOOD LUCK!!
COME ON BROOKSY!!!!
-Crickett
ANY PICKS MADE IN THIS SHOW ARE NOT SPORTSPICKS "OFFICIAL PICKS"
START TIME - 8:00 AM EST
🔥 June 21, 2026 Degenerate Special 🔥
Afternoon slate locked with high-K arms! 🔥
Your Locked Open Bets (placed & pending):
1. 3-Leg Parlay — Odds: +121
• Chase Burns 6+ Strikeouts (-440) — CIN Reds @ NY Yankees 1:36 PM ET
• Dylan Cease 6+ Strikeouts (-275) — TOR Blue Jays @ CHC Cubs 2:21 PM ET
• Logan Gilbert 6+ Strikeouts (-310) — BOS Red Sox @ SEA Mariners 4:11 PM ET
2. 5-Leg Parlay — Odds: +200
• Chase Burns 6+ Strikeouts (-420) — CIN @ NYY 1:36 PM ET
• Logan Webb 4+ Strikeouts (-900) — SF Giants @ MIA Marlins 1:41 PM ET
• Dustin May 4+ Strikeouts (-500) — STL Cardinals @ KC Royals 2:11 PM ET
• Dylan Cease 6+ Strikeouts (-275) — TOR @ CHC 2:21 PM ET
• Logan Gilbert 6+ Strikeouts (-300) — BOS @ SEA 4:11 PM ET
Single Bet
• Dylan Cease Over 6.5 Strikeouts (-132) — TOR @ CHC 2:21 PM ET
#MLBProps #StrikeoutBets #DegenerateMode 🤑⚾
First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.
Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe.