NBA PREVIEW March 1st
CHA travels to PHI as an 11.5 point favorite with a total of 213.5
CHA’s M. Williams and Ball are out. G.Williams is a game time decision.
PHI’s Oubre, Martin are game time decisions. Melton, Embiid and Covington are out.
Early public action shows 74% lean toward CHA and 88% favor the under.
CLE travels to DET as an 8.5 point fave with a total of 221.5
CLE’s Thompson and Jerome are out. Mitchell and LaVert are game time decisions.
DET’s Sasser is out.
Early public action shows 81% lean toward DET and 71% favor the under.
DAL travels to BOS as an 8.5 point dog with a total of 237.5
DAL’s Luka is a game time decision. BOS’s Brissett is a game time decision.
Early public action shows 64% lean toward DAL and 58% favor the under.
GS travels to TOR as a 3.5 point favorite with a total of 235.5
GS”s Wiggins is out. Santos and Podziemski is a game time decision.
TOR’s Nowell and Boucher are game time decisions.
Early public action shows 77% lean toward GS and 59% favor the over.
POR travels to MEM as a 1.5 point dog with a total of 207.5
POR’s Sharpe, Brogdan are out. Brown and Ayton are game time decisions.
MEM’s Smart, Rose,Pippen,J. Jackson, Clarke and Bane are out.
G. Jackson,Kennard,Conchar are game time decisions.
Early public action shows 57% lean toward POR and 59% favor the under.
IN travels to NO as a 5.5 point dog with a total of 238.5
IN’s Nesmith is a game time decision. McDermott is out. NO’s Daniels is out.
Early public action shows 69% lean toward NO and 82% favor the over.
SAC travels to MN as a 6.5 point dog with a total of 224.5
SAC’s Vezenkov is out. Fox is a game time decision. MN’s Edwards and Anderson are GTD.
Early public action shows 62% lean toward MN and 57% favor the over.
MIL travels to CHI as a 4.5 point favorite with a total of 222.5
MIL’s Middleton is out. Giannis is a game time decision.
CHI’s Craig is out and Caruso is a game time decision.
Early public action shows 66% lean toward MIL and 94% favor the under.
WSH travels to LAC as a 16.5 point dog with a total of 238.5
WSH’s Coulibaly and Ball are game time decisions.
LAC’s Zubac and George are game time decisions
Early public action shows 65% lean toward LAC and 60% favor the under.
NCAAM TOP 25 PREVIEW March 1st
#21 DAY travels to L-IL as a 1.5 point favorite with a total of 137.5
Early public action shows 69% lean toward Loyola and 52% favor the over.
Air Force travels to #22 UT ST as a 16.5 point dog with a total of 136.5
AF’s Mills is a game time decision. Green is out.
Early public action shows 94% lean toward UT ST and 66% favor the over.
🔥 July 2, 2026 Degenerate Special 🔥
Afternoon & evening slate locked with high-K arms! 🔥
Your Locked Open Bets (placed & pending):
1. 3-Leg Same Game Parlay+ — Odds: +130
• Chase Burns 6+ Strikeouts — CIN Reds @ MIL Brewers 2:11 PM ET
• Jacob Misiorowski 9+ Strikeouts — CIN Reds @ MIL Brewers 2:11 PM ET (SGP)
• Bryce Miller 6+ Strikeouts — LAA Angels @ SEA Mariners 9:41 PM ET
#MLBProps #StrikeoutBets #DegenerateMode 🤑⚾
An old friend of mine is with visiting his wife's family down in Mexico and he was watching the USA/Bosnia game last night.
He was watching the Mexican channel broadcast with obviously Spanish speaking commentators (my friend also speaks Spanish).
He said they spent the whole rest of the game, post-red card, just shitting on the ref, saying stuff that would get people fired on USA television 🤣🤣
First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.
Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe.