NBA RECAP Mar 29th
SA covered as an 8.5 point dog against NY winning 130 to 126 in OT.
The over cashed in.
DET covered as a 3.5 point dog against WSH winning 96 to 87.
The under cashed in.
LAC covered as 1.5 point favorite against ORL winning 100 to 97.
The under cashed in.
IN covered as a 3.5 point favorite against LAL winning 109 to 90.
The under cashed in.
GS covered as a 12.5 point favorite against CHA winning 115 to 97.
The under cashed in.
BKN covered as a 3.5 point dog against CHI winning 125 to 108.
The over cashed in.
PHI covered as a 7.5 point dog against CLE losing 114 to 117.
The over cashed in.
OKC covered as a 1.5 point dog against PHX winning 128 to 103.
The over cashed in.
MIA covered as a 13.5 point favorite against POR winning 142 to 82.
The over cashed in.
MN covered as a 2.5 point dog against DEN winning 111 to 98.
The under cashed in.
UT covered as an 8.5 point dog against HOU losing 100 to 101.
The under cashed in.
DAL covered as a 1.5 point favorite against SAC winning 107 to 103.
The under cashed in.
NBA PREVIEW March 30th
BOS travels to NO as a 6.5 point favorite with a total of 223.5
BOS’s Springer and Davidson are out. NO’s Ingrahm and Alvarado are out. Daniels is a GTD.
Early public action shows 67% lean toward BOS and 76 % favor the under.
MEM travels to ORL as a 13.5 point dog with a total of 205.5
MEM’s Williams,Wantanabe,Smart, and Bane are out.
Conchar and Aldama are game time decisions.
ORL’s Fultz is a game time decision.
Early public action shows 54% lean toward ORL and 71% favor the under.
MIL travels to ATL as a 4.5 point favorite with a total of 233.5
MIL’s Middleton, Beverly, Beauchamp and Giannis are GTD.
Lillard is out. ATL’s Young, Gueye, Griffin, Bufkin are out. Johnson is a GTD.
Early public action shows 57% lean toward ATL and 85% favor the over.
NCAAM Sweet Sixteen Recap March 29th
#11 NC ST covered as a 7.5 point dog against #2 MARQ winning 67 to 58.
The under cashed in.
#1 PUR covered as a 4.5 point favorite against #5 GONZ winning 80 to 68.
The under cashed in.
#4 Duke covered as a 3.5 point dog against #1 HOU winning 54 to 51.
The under cashed in
#2 TN covered as a 3.5 point favorite against #3 CRE winning 82 to 75.
The over cashed in.
NCAAM ROUND OF 8 PREVIEW March 30th
Elite 8 !!
#3 IL plays #1 UCONN as a 8.5 point dog with a total of 155.5
Early public action shows 62% lean toward UCONN and 75% favor the over.
#6 CLEM plays #4 AL as a 3.5 point dog with a total of 163.5
AL’s Wrightsell is a game time decision.
ANY PICKS MADE IN THIS SHOW ARE NOT SPORTSPICKS "OFFICIAL PICKS"
START TIME - 8:00 AM EST
🔥 June 21, 2026 Degenerate Special 🔥
Afternoon slate locked with high-K arms! 🔥
Your Locked Open Bets (placed & pending):
1. 3-Leg Parlay — Odds: +121
• Chase Burns 6+ Strikeouts (-440) — CIN Reds @ NY Yankees 1:36 PM ET
• Dylan Cease 6+ Strikeouts (-275) — TOR Blue Jays @ CHC Cubs 2:21 PM ET
• Logan Gilbert 6+ Strikeouts (-310) — BOS Red Sox @ SEA Mariners 4:11 PM ET
2. 5-Leg Parlay — Odds: +200
• Chase Burns 6+ Strikeouts (-420) — CIN @ NYY 1:36 PM ET
• Logan Webb 4+ Strikeouts (-900) — SF Giants @ MIA Marlins 1:41 PM ET
• Dustin May 4+ Strikeouts (-500) — STL Cardinals @ KC Royals 2:11 PM ET
• Dylan Cease 6+ Strikeouts (-275) — TOR @ CHC 2:21 PM ET
• Logan Gilbert 6+ Strikeouts (-300) — BOS @ SEA 4:11 PM ET
Single Bet
• Dylan Cease Over 6.5 Strikeouts (-132) — TOR @ CHC 2:21 PM ET
#MLBProps #StrikeoutBets #DegenerateMode 🤑⚾
First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.
Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe.