2% max recommended unless otherwise noted. 1% max recommended on debate bets.
VP Bets
Predictit
GOP VP Vance YES 17%
GOP VP Carson YES 6%
GOP VP Burgum NO 61%
UK Election
BetUs
1% Most Seats REFORM +5500
Conservative Vote UNDER 20.5%
Labour Vote UNDER 42.5%
Liberal Dem Vote UNDER 13.5%
Reform Vote OVER 16.5%
Labour Margin of Victory Under 17.5%
Debate Bets
BetUs
Debate Exceed 90 minutes NO
10/12 Topics Discussed UNDER
First Topic Foreign Policy +250
Handshake YES +200
CNN Poll Winner Biden -125
Biden Striped Tie +175
1st State Mentioned Pennsylvania +325
1st Sip of Water Biden -130
Moderator Accused of Bias YES +150
Major Gaffe NO +110
2020 Election YES -150
Fact checking interruptions UNDER 10.5 times
Biden Mention infrastructure Bill in 1st 15 minutes YES
Biden Comment on Crypto NO
Trump to mention MAGA OVER 1.5 times
1st Candidate to mention Economy Trump -120
1st Candidate to mention COVID Biden -120
1st Candidate to mention China Trump -120
UFC OKC Sherdog prelim picks
https://www.sherdog.com/news/articles/1/Preview-UFC-Oklahoma-City-prelims-201915
World Cup Semi Finals England vs Argentina - My Picks
0.5% Over 2.5 goals at 39c (good to 44c)
0.5% Both teams to score at 52c (good to 56c)
(Optional) 0.5% Game to go to penalties at 19c (good to 22c)
The second semi final will begin shortly between England and Argentina. This will be a fiery semi final as the two countries have a historical football rivalry going back to the 1980s when Diego Maradona scored his infamous "Hand of God" goal before going an mazy run to score one of the all time World Cup goals. It was a tense matchup even back then due to the military conflict between England and Argentina. This conflict may go back to before many fans were born but there is certainly no love lost between these teams when it comes to football.
England made it to the semi final with an athletic, transition based system under Thomas Tuchel. This has been effective against opponents who play more openly, such as Croatia and Mexico while struggling more against opponents who are able to ...
First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.
Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe.