There's a betting market on the next world leader to leave office.
Here's the list:
Netanyahu, Lula, Zelensky, Starmer, Milei, Macron, Trump, Erdogan, Lukashenko, Kim Jong Un, Xi Jinping
We know Macron is leaving in 2027, so we can exclude Erdogan, Trump, and Milei because their terms end after his.
Let's exclude Xi Jinping, Kim Jong Un, and Lukashenko because they're strongmen who are unlikely to go before Macron.
That leaves us with:
Netanyahu, Lula, Zelensky, Starmer, and Macron.
Personally, I think Zelensky will go first, but I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Who do you guys think will go first?
Gavin Williams Over 6.5 Ks -156 is the best straight-up strikeout play on the slate.
He’s been unstoppable lately — 12, 11, 11, and 11 strikeouts in his last four starts. That’s elite form. The line is still sitting at a soft 6.5, and he’s facing the Diamondbacks.
When a pitcher is rolling like this and the number is this low, you take it.
Play: Gavin Williams Over 6.5 -156
Record: 0-1-0
(96-90-5 overall)
🔥 August 2, 2026 Degenerate Special 🔥
Afternoon slate locked with high-K arms! 🔥
Your Locked Open Bets (placed & pending):
1. 3-Leg Parlay — Odds: -120
• Zack Wheeler 6+ Strikeouts (-560) — PHI Phillies @ BAL Orioles 1:36 PM ET
• Gavin Williams 6+ Strikeouts (-370) — ARI Diamondbacks @ CLE Guardians 1:41 PM ET
• Jacob Misiorowski 8+ Strikeouts (-440) — MIL Brewers @ LAA Angels 3:16 PM ET
#MLBProps #StrikeoutBets #DegenerateMode 🤑⚾
First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.
Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe.