I have requested a payout a week ago from predictit. It looks like they have no intention of paying. Is anyone else in the same boat? Do we need to get legal council?
My Strikeout AI Algorithm 8.7.1 is Currently LOCKED IN.
9-0 the past 9 days using for 3-Legs Teasers. 4-0 today on all teasers.
🔥 June 23, 2026 Degenerate Special 🔥
Main teaser + alternate + long shot 5-leg locked in! 🔥
Your Locked Open Bets (placed & pending):
Main 3-Leg Parlay — Odds: -124
• Carlos Rodon 5+ Strikeouts (-360) — NY Yankees @ DET Tigers 6:41 PM ET
• Jesus Luzardo 5+ Strikeouts (-440) — PHI Phillies @ WSH Nationals 6:46 PM ET
• Parker Messick 4+ Strikeouts (-650) — CLE Guardians @ CWS White Sox 7:41 PM ET
Alternate 3-Leg Parlay (smaller amount) — Odds: -107
• Carlos Rodon 5+ Strikeouts (-360) — NYY @ DET 6:41 PM ET
• Jesus Luzardo 5+ Strikeouts (-440) — PHI @ WSH 6:46 PM ET
• Sean Burke 5+ Strikeouts (-420) — CLE @ CWS 7:41 PM ET
Long Shot 5-Leg Same Game Parlay+ — Odds: +161
• SGP (CLE @ CWS): Parker Messick 4+
• Sean Burke 5+ Strikeouts
• Carlos Rodon 5+ Strikeouts
• Jesus Luzardo 5+ Strikeouts
• Shane Baz 4+ Strikeouts — BAL Orioles @ LAA Angels 9:39
#MLBProps #StrikeoutBets #DegenerateMode 🤑⚾
First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.
Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe.