SportsPicks
Politics • Investing & Finance • Sports
All your sports information for those investing Vegas-style in the outcomes of sports games. Predicting games against the line in all sports, especially football, American and English style.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

Betting Nomenclature

There has been confusion lately in interpreting the official picks. I'd like to post this as a brief primer that can be referred back to in order to answer questions about the picks and what they mean. In what follows I will be using common betting terminology. If you haven't encountered one of these terms, I have a brief glossary at the bottom of this post.

The general format of pick is a specified maximum proportion of bankroll on a particular outcome at a guide market price with a limit that estimates what the fair value of that bet should be at the time. Let's look at an example pick from Major League Baseball.

2% STL 41% Mets (ok at any point 50% or less, or +100 or higher)

2% denotes the maximum proportion of your bankroll to assign to this bet. Note that Barnes' bankroll sizing is rather aggressive and can eat into your bankroll during cold streaks (which inevitably happens with high volume betting). If you are new to betting, have a lower risk appetite or otherwise are not acquainted with the markets you're betting on, I would strongly recommend scaling down the size of your bet by at least half (in this case, you would only put 1% on the example bet above). If you are happy to risk 2%, go ahead and place 2% or you can even place more than 2%, but this is not recommended and is sheerly at your own discretion.

Since this is an MLB bet, there are two teams listed corresponding to the particular fixture. In the above example, STL is shorthand for St Louis' Cardinals and Mets is the New York Mets. The team that you are recommended to back is always listed first and in capital letters. The team you are betting against will be in standard case and listed second. In the above case, you are betting on the Cardinals against the Mets.

The number between the teams is the market price at the time of the pick. Note the odds format. In this case, it is 41%, which means if you opened up Kalshi at the time of the pick, you would see the market for Cardinals to win would have shares available at market at 41c each. It is up to you whether you enter at market and buy at 41c or set a limit order at a lower price and hope to get filled. Note that you should factor into account fees before you place your order. Kalshi will show what your fees will be on the order tab. Note also that Kalshi offers yes and no on both teams individually. That is to say, buying shares of yes on the Cardinals to win is the same as buying shares of no on the Mets to win. Sometimes these are not priced the same and the orderbooks might be thinner on one of these options, giving you an opportunity to get a more favourable entry price. If you do not have Kalshi, you can take this bet at a sportsbook but note that the odds will be different, generally less favourable that what you would get on prediction markets. If the Cardinals are trading at 41c, you would generally see them listed around +130 to +135 on a sportsbook.

The good to line is listed at 50% for prediction markets or +100 on sportsbooks. This is a important number to pay attention to because there are no certainties in betting, only probabilities. Therefore, you are not looking for bets that are a "sure thing", you're looking at bets that are underpriced compared to what they should be. If the price is more generous than the good to limit, the pick is good to take. If not, you can still take the pick but it is no longer recommended and is hence at your discretion. In this case, if the price of the Cardinals to win goes above 50c on Kalshi or if their odds reduce below +100 (going into -100 and below), the original edge in the pick is no longer clearly identifiable. Note that this does not necessarily mean the bet is no longer good; the line may have moved due to a completely different factor than the bet's edge (for example an injury) but on the other hand the market might have caught up to the edge. This also doesn't mean to sell the bet if it goes beyond that point (though you can if you believe the prices has overcompensated the other way). Once again, use your discretion. If you get a good entry the bet is generally good to hold.

No we'll go through a few formats of bet. The example above is a moneyline bet. When you see odds posted between two teams, that's moneyline.

Let's now look at a spread bet.

2% CLE +1.5 48% Dodgers (ok at any point 55% or less, or -125 or lower)

This pick means that you are backing the Cleveland Indians (currently known as the Guardians, Barnes sometimes calls them the fake Indians) against the spread. This means when you add 1.5 to Cleveland's final score, the bet will be a success if Cleveland's total exceeds that of the Dodgers. So if Cleveland loses by one run or wins outright, the bet will be successful. If Clevaland loses by two or more runs, the bet is unsuccessful. Correspondingly, the other side is Dodgers -1.5 which means the bet is successful if the Dodgers win by two or more runs but fails if they win by one or lose outright.

How do we differentiate between spread and moneyline bets? American moneyline notation always has at least three digits as it's expressed as a ratio between stake and winning multiplied by one hundred. Plus money is when profit is bigger than stake, so profit divided by stake multiplied by one hundred is guaranteed to be at least +100. Minus money is when stake is bigger than profit, so stake divided by profit ensures odds approach -100 (but never reach -100 as then it becomes +100). So when you see three digits or more, that's always moneyline. You're not going to see teams with a spread of a hundred points. So when you see a one or two digit number (pre decimal place), that's a spread bet.

On sportsbooks the spread options are one of the main ones listed at the top of the game page so they're pretty easy to find. The main spread offered is the median spread, where each side is priced as close to the other as possible. Sportsbooks generally offer alternative spread lines too but be careful with those, there's higher edge if you know what you're doing but the overround tends to be higher so they can potentially end up ripping you off more than the corresponding median line. On Polymarket the spreads are pretty straightforward too as you can buy Cleveland +1.5 and your counterparty will have Dodgers -1.5. On Kalshi, the principle is the same but the wording is different. Kalshi doesn't phrase it as buying Cleveland +1.5, it phrases it as will the Dodgers win by over 1.5 runs? Kalshi's convention is to assign yes to the favourite covering the spread, so no corresponds to the underdog covering the spread. If you are on the Dodgers, you buy yes on that market. If you're on Cleveland, you buy no on this market, as no on Dodgers -1.5 is equivalent to yes on Cleveland +1.5.

Next let's consider a total.

2% MICHIGAN-ARIZONA UNDER 157.5 51% (ok to 55% or -125)

This bet is for the total number of points scored between both Michigan and Arizona in the March Madness Final Four matchup not to be 158 or more. On Sportsbooks, this is one again pretty straightforward, totals are listed with standard game line. On Polymarket, you have a standard market for over 157.5 or under 157.5. On Kalshi, the market would be will there be more than 157.5 points scored between Michigan and Arizona? Kalshi's convention is for the yes to correspond to the over and the no to correspond to the under.

Now let's look at a parlay.

2% PARLAY MICHIGAN +4.5 & Illinois +3.5 +115 (ok to +100)

This is a bet for Michigan to cover a spread of +4.5 and Illinois to cover a spread of +3.5. Both teams must fulfil this condition for the bet to cash. Sportsbooks offer parlays but make sure to check the odds to make sure they're not shaving off extra value. You can do this by converting the separate odds to implied probabilities, multiplying them and converting back to standard odds. Generally for more or less independent events the quoted odds will be the same as the implied odds, especially with reputable bookmakers, but once again due your own due diligence. The bet above looks like a teaser, which is an adjusted parlay where spread lines are adjusted to make the bet closer in odds to a standard bet. For independent events, a parlay is equivalent to betting on the first leg and then rolling over the winnings to the second bet. Therefore, betting them separately as straights is another valid option and with prediction markets, this will generally get you a better edge. Kalsi offers its own version of a parlay called the Kalshi combo, but as far as I'm aware it's only available on the mobile app and as far as I can tell the app is only available in the US. I'm sure there are workarounds for that but I haven't tested it as I prefer straights from a theoretical point of view anyway.

Let's look at a player prop now.

1% WALKER Receiving Yards 20+ YES 55% (ok at any point up to 65%)

This is a pick from the Super Bowl as it is for Kenneth Walker III of the Seattle Seahawks to have at least 20 receiving yards. This pick is pretty straightforward, so there's no need to elaborate, only to say that if you are looking on prediction markets you will have to scroll down the page and find the player props dropdown on Kalshi, whereas on Polymarket, there are separate tabs for player props.

Next we have a futures pick.

1% DUKE 23% (ok at any point 30% or below)

This is for Duke to win March Madness. You can find this under the futures section on Polymarket or Kalshi. If you take this on a sportsbook you may not be able to cash out or if you can it may be at unfavourable odds. On prediction markets you can cash out at fair prices based on who is willing to match your order.

Finally, we'll look at a politics pick.

2% Fed Maintains Rate in March NO

This pick is for the Federal Reserve to decide from their March meeting to change interest rates. We do this indirectly by taking the market for them to leave rates unchanged and buying no on it. This means that if they raise or lower rates at all in March, the bet is successful. If not, the bet is unsuccessful.

I hope this will help to clarify Barnes' betting conventions. Remember, double and triple check your bets before you place them and if you're not sure, stay away. Consistent profits come from discipline, attention to detail and smart line shopping. Good luck and good gambling!

Glossary - see below for terms used above

Bankroll - the amount of money you've set aside for betting. In Barnes' words, it should be a sum of money that you could lose and not blink twice. This is not necessarily your entire betting capital, it is simply a sum of money allocated to a particular sector of betting. It is recommended that you maintain separate bankrolls for sports betting and political betting. You can replenish bankrolls if you want, important thing is that if you have an edge, you are able to remain solvent.

Sportsbook - a traditional bookmaker that offers a specific set of betting markets at odds posted by them. They have limits on how much you can bet and some will even ban you if you win too much (English bookmakers are notorious for this, Irish bookmakers less so and American bookmakers tend to limit your parlays).

Prediction Market - a betting exchange where instead of betting against the bookmaker at the bookmaker's odds, you bet peer to peer against another site user. You can take any position you want at any price you want so long as you can find someone who is willing to take the other side of the order. That is to say, if you want to bet yes on an outcome, you need someone who is willing to bet no at an equivalent price because the money you put up is collateral for your counterparty. You can enter at market and fill someone else's existing order but you will generally pay fees on this. You can also enter a limit order to enter at a price you like but there's no guarantee someone else will fill your order. You may still pay a small fee on certain markets on Kalshi or you may even be given a rebate as on certain markets on Polymarket.

Orders - an instruction to the bookmaker or prediction market to enter a position if one is available. When you decide to enter a position now, you submit a market order and it will execute at the lowest price available. At a sportsbook, this will be the price listed by the bookmaker. On a prediction market, this will be the lowest ask on the order book. A limit order allows you to specify the maximum price you would like to enter a position at. If an order matches yours, you enter at your desired price. Market orders will ensure you get in if there are any orders available on the other side but you will pay a premium for the convenience. Limit orders give you a better price if you are patient but you are not guaranteed to get filled at all. Bookmakers don't offer limit orders, so you will have to go to prediction markets or betting exchanges to avail of them. Limit orders are one of the primary edges you can avail of on prediction markets.

Odds - odds can take a number of different formats, including American (plus or minus before odds number), fractional (used by Irish, British and Australian bookmakers), decimal (international bookmakers such as Pinnacle) and percentage (used by prediction markets to price shares in an event outcome). Bookmakers and prediction markets often have a setting to display odds in the desired format.

Resolution Criteria - the conditions that must be met for a bet to be successful. For most markets these will be straightforward, but it is your responsibility to make sure you know the terms and conditions of the bet before you take it. Do not assume that the resolution criteria will be reasonable. On sportsbooks you may have to dig a bit for resolution criteria. On prediction markets it will be listen on the market page. Resolution criteria may be different for similar markets on different platforms.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
The Association - 3/18/26

ANY PICKS MADE IN THIS VIDEO ARE NOT SPORTSPICKS "OFFICIAL PICKS"

00:31:32
Puck Around & Find Out - 3/18/26

ANY PICKS MADE IN THIS VIDEO ARE NOT SPORTSPICKS "OFFICIAL PICKS"

00:26:19
The Association - 3/17/26

ANY PICKS MADE IN THIS VIDEO ARE NOT SPORTSPICKS "OFFICIAL PICKS"

00:25:00
SEC Preview Podcast

A full breakdown of every team in the SEC, including talent analysis, coordinator concern, and schedule forecasts, with win total expectations. Enjoy!

SEC Preview Podcast
Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB

March Madness final four recap and Championship preview...

Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
Live Chat for 2025

Open until the end of the year, and pinned here.

OFFICIAL PICKS: Madness, Title Game, 2026

2% MICHIGAN -6.5 UConn (ok to -4.5 62% or -7 -110)

🔥 April 6 Degenerate Special 🔥

Top Overs (Main Props):
Sale O7.5 | deGrom O6.5 | Gilbert O6.5 | Woodruff O5.5 | Painter O6.5

Locked Parlays:

• 2-Leg: Sale O6.5 + Woodruff O4.5 (+169)

• 3-Leg (Main Teaser): Sale O6.5 + deGrom O5.5 + Gilbert O5.5 (+128)

• 4-Leg: Sale O6.5 + deGrom O5.5 + Gilbert O5.5 + Painter O5.5 (+207)

Early-Season Warning: Tiny samples = bigger swings — bet responsibly!
#MLBProps #StrikeoutBets #DegenerateMode 🤑⚾

post photo preview
Barnes Betting Report: Midterm Elections

Historical Context

  • Without war, recession or major scandal, the odds of the White House party losing 25+ House seats & 5+ Senate seats is a relative rarity in the post-WW2 modern era, covering 20 midterm elections. The Senate saw 5+ flips in 1946 (war ending), 1958 (recession), 1986 (midwest/farm recession), 1994 (evangelicals join the GOP down ballot), 2006 (Iraq war), 2010 (GFC recession) * 2014 (Obama hangover). That means in 15 of the last 20 midterms, the Senate saw little shift. Indeed, the party holding the White House has just as often gained seats in the Senate as lost them, including the last 2 midterm election cycles. The House saw 25+ house seats flip in 1946 (war ended), 1950 (Korean War), 1958 (recession), 1966 (Vietnam war), 1974 (Watergate), 1982 (recession), 1994 (evangelicals join GOP down ballot), 2006 (Iraq War), 2010 (GFC), and 2018 (anti-Trump). The House, with all seats up every cycle, are more vulnerable to swings against the party in the White House, but claims of inevitability are greatly overstated. Even the House is only 50-50 in the post-WW2 era in massive swings, with the most vulnerable swings occurring when one party has a lopsided edge in the House. Point in fact, since 1986, 60% of the time the House has not had a major 25+ swing in seats in midterm elections. The same rule holds for each part of Congress -- without war, recession or major scandal, massive shifts are far more uncommon than common. That said, when a war is raging or just ended, a recession haunts the economy, or a major scandal consumes the news, the odds of a major shift in at least one of the two houses of Congress is a perfect 7-for-7, and the odds of a major shift in both houses of Congress is 6-for-7. Without a recession, war or scandal, the odds of a big swing in both houses of Congress drop dramatically to just 2-for-13, with both coming in major realignment elections (evangelicals join GOP down ballot in 1994 & old Jacksonian Democrats from the reverse-L of eastern Oklahoma to western North Carolina, up through Kentucky and Ohio of Appalachian hearland swing away from Obama's Democrats). 

2026

  • GOP enters with a 3-vote edge in the Senate, with 53 Republicans, though they must lose 4 seats to lose control (due to VP's tie-breaking vote), and maybe even 5 (if Fetterman flips to vote with the GOP & Murkowski does not flip to the Dems). GOP enters with a 2-vote edge in the House, with 218 Republicans and 214 Democrats, and 3 vacancies representing 2 Republican-held seats, and 1 Democratic held seat. The Supreme Court's slow action reversing the Voting Rights Act limits the chance of effective redistricting, while redistricting currently net favors Democrats if the Virginia redistricting succeeds and the Texas redistricting in Mexican ancestral areas of Texas showed they likely trend Democratic in the recent primary. The current Iran war, the risk of looming recession, the possibility of lurking scandals, and the lost realignment of the Trump 2024 coalition all point to this cycle being a major shift in both houses. Baris' polls amongst the extremely enthused show Democrats with a double-digit lead on the generic ballot, unheard of in the contemporary era since the realignment of evangelicals in 1994. 

2026 Senate

  • The competitive seats identified by third party observers are: Maine, Michigan, Ohio, Iowa, North Carolina, Georgia, South Carolina, Texas, Nebraska, and Alaska. Currently, Republicans old all but 2 of these competitive seats, making them more vulnerable due to the map of seats up for election this cycle. Internal GOP polls and Baris' polls show the races already as a dead heat in Ohio, Iowa and Alaska, with the GOP candidate down in Maine, Michigan, North Carolina, and Georgia. Should Cornyn win the nomination in Texas and Graham in South Carolina, as well as the establishment candidates prevail in the GOP primaries in Iowa, GOP vulnerability increases due to up to one-third of GOP primary voters saying they will not vote for either in the general election. My odds for these states voting Democrats in the Senate are as follows for these 10 seats:
  1. Michigan: 95%
  2. Maine: 85%
  3. North Carolina: 80%
  4. Georgia: 75% 
  5. Ohio: 65%
  6. Alaska: 65%
  7. Iowa: 60% (75% if Carlin loses the primary; 50% if Carlin wins the primary)
  8. Texas: 50% (65% of Cornyn is nominee; 35% if Paxton is nominee)
  9. South Carolina: 50% (65% of Graham is nominee; 35% if Lynch or Dans is nominee)
  10. Nebraska: 40% (Independent is one to watch)
  • Senate Overall in 2027: 53-47 Democratic, with Murkowski likely to flip to the Democrats, and Fetterman staying put on the Democratic side, increasing that to 54-46 in voting terms. I set the odd of the Senate going Democratic at 80%. 

House 2026

  • The key competitive seats are in the industrial/rural midwest and the heavily Hispanic southwest, with both constituencies recent GOP converts now returning en masse to Democratic voting habits their voting ancestry supports. These are both war-sensitive demographics, as well as recession-sensitive demographics. The Democratic message of the Epstein Class vs the Working Class resonates deeply with these voter groups. Meanwhile, voter enthusiasm amongst GOP-leaning independents hit new lows in a range of voter surveys, evidenced by the 27-0 edge Democrats enjoy in flipping state legislative seats over the last 6 months or so & the lopsided Democratic edge in turnout in the Texas primaries (exceeding GOP turnout for the first time since 2002). I forecast only 1 currently heald Democratic seat flipping to the GOP: Texas CD 32; by contrast, I forecast 33 seats flipping to the Democrats, for a seat profile in 2027 House that is 246 Democrats, and 189 Republicans. I see the odds of the House going Democratic at 98%. These are the seats I see as likely flipping to the Democrats in 2026 midterms: 
  1. Alaska At Large
  2. Arizona 1
  3. Arizona 2
  4. Arizona 6
  5. California 1
  6. California 6
  7. California 22
  8. California 48
  9. Colorado 3
  10. Colorado 5
  11. Colorado 8
  12. Florida 7
  13. Iowa 1
  14. Iowa 2
  15. Iowa 3
  16. Michigan 4
  17. Michigan 7
  18. Michigan 10
  19. Montana 1
  20. Nebraska 2
  21. New Jersey 7
  22. North Carolina 11
  23. Pennsylvania 1
  24. Pennsylvania 7
  25. Pennsylvania 8
  26. Pennsylvania 10
  27. Tennessee 5
  28. Texas 15
  29. Utah 1
  30. Virginia 1
  31. Virginia 2
  32. Wisconsin 1
  33. Wisconsin 3
Read full Article
post photo preview
Thoughts on Last Night

Around around she goes; we she ends, nobody knows. Only truly beatable infinity, unless you believe in luck So The Good Thief lead character explains as he sees the ball chase around the roulette wheel. But it wasn't luck that lost me last night; it was failing to follow my own methodologies for the best decision making in the world of prediction markets.  

Many of my assumptions held (Mamdani bets cashed to a profit, the Democratic sweep happened, and Morris County flipped to Sherrill, while closest race was the Virginia Attorney General), but a big one didn't -- that 2025 would not bring a record-setting Democratic wave. The wave crested like a tsunami, felt coast to coast, from the northeast to the southwest, from the midatlantic to the mountains, from the industrial midwest to the southern countryside, effecting small town mayoral races in Pennsylvania to Public Service Commission statewide gigs in Georgia, from legislative districts with 36 year incumbents in ruby red Virginia heartland to the most revolutionary Mayor ever elected in New York City since Henry George's failed effort signaled the rise of Populism a century+ ago. Candidate quality did not matter. Candidate spending did not matter. Incumbency did not matter. Job approval did not matter. Scandals did not matter enough or did not matter at all. Get out the vote efforts did not matter. This was an angry electorate seeking vengance, and finding its expression wherever they could. 

That was my first mistake, and it was a mistake, rather than bad luck. I assessed the wave risk at 10%, when it was manifestly much higher. All I needed to do was listen to....myself. I went back and watched my last episode w/ Baris and an episode a few months ago with the Duran, the latter where I previewed a collapse in GOP support if Trump didn't escape the foreign focus & wars, delivering only to the donor class. I spoke often of the new MAGA that began to build in 2023 -- young, working class, often minority, deeply unhappy with the political direction of an elder class they are rebelling against, as easily tempted by left populism as right populism, and as easily susceptible to political apathy and agnosticism as engagement & activism. The shutdown was actually a negative tipping factor for these voters, as the SNAP issue played poorly with them, while enraging part of the Democratic base otherwise unenthused up to that point. I made two errors in methodology & one error in psychology I detail below. 

The second error was bankroll percentage. It was a single race in a single state; as such, keeping it closer to 5% made more sense than expending it to 34%, especially if more cognizant of the risk. It also shifted my stronger risk appetite onto others, and that was en error I usually well avoid. If I had listed every major election pick this year at 5%, we'd be in the black; even last night, splitting 5% bets amidst the 3 elections, would have only been a modest loss, given certain underdog bets hit with Mamdani. As I often say, but forgot here to practice -- bankroll discipline is the most important aspect of successful trading in the markets, sports or politics. 

The psychological error was getting attached to a pick, and not relooking at it from scratch anytime new information arives. A natural tendency is to stay committed to something merely because of prior committment rather than look at it completely anew, and being afraid of taking a loss when once vested in so much hope of a win. 

Areas to improve:

  • using the methodological approach of motivated reasoning -- you cannot make reason the master of motivation, but you can use motivation to master reasoning. The Elephant in the Brain. I needed to put myself in a position to take the opposite side of each pick, make the best argument possible for it, and then test it against the other side. In this respect, one way to best maximize this is to include substack-style articles on this site laying out the argument, and letting the community respond -- as several sagely warned in this case, which can dramatically improve the quality of reasoning;
  • tracking all data available -- for example, whether an off-year election could be a wave election that might have polls actually overstate the White House incumbent party that even the GOP the polls tend to be biased against & digger deep dives into possible explanation for a poll's results (for examply, Miyares surge was partly fog, by Democratic voters choosing undecided rather than voting against b/c they didn't want to admit they secretly supported the murderous texts of their Attorney General candidate; 
  • waiting until election eve and election day, especially in the US elections, as the volatility proffers the best opportunities, and the best information is then availabile if timely processed; 
  • finding a way to better track live-time data on election night by reemploying an older technique from my political campaign days -- prior to the election, predicting the expected % for each county (and key precincts when available) in terms of expected vote share & vote distribution, which can most accurately forecast where an election will go, to get ahead of the markets (the big models out there completely crashed last night, including the $250K new-and-improved Decision Desk model;
  • avoiding all bubbles & returning to getting into the head of a wide range of voting groups, something I long excelled in, but have to dedicate myself to these days due to inhabiting a political world more these days that can make me too responsive to criticism -- "hey Barnes, you're a panican; hey Barnes, your Barnes/Baris voter is mythical; you don't get it, Jack is a lock in New Jersey". I need to step into the minds of these independent voters, and keep listening to the independent podcasters who were a useful signal in 2024 and 2025 -- see how Andrew Stein, Tim Dhillon, Joe Rogan, Dave Smith, Theo Von -- all left Trump train in the summer of 2025;
  • staying within the 5% max recommendation on a single election in a single state unless extraordinary reason supported by extraordinary evidence recommends otherwise, and including the assumptions in those extraordinary picks such that the pick can be sold off quick if those assumptions show other signs in the data

Truth is, losses teach you more than wins. Despite as much as I try to track the underlying assumptions of winning picks, the stay-up-top-3-am reearching and obsessing motivation comes from tough losses. In addition, I learn the values of patience, forbearance, discipline, emotional equilibrium, self-belief, as well as better improving a sound methodological approach through "putting my money where mouth is" and sharing it with the world for public accountability and transparency improving decision-making skill over time, maintaining humility when the trap of hubris would otherwise ensnare.

After three decades of successful US elections, my setback in 2022 dramatically improved my analysis for 2024, proving fantastically profitable. Thanks to everyone for participating, hope you continue to partake in the community, and if I were a betting man, and I am, I would wager we will be profitable again, in matters of pocketbook, principle and politics very soon. 

Read full Article
post photo preview
OFFICIAL PICKS: SPORTSPICKS, WEEK 16, 2024 -- Tuesday, December 10, 2024

2% max recommended unless otherwise noted. 1% max recommended for soccer. 

 

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals