World Cup Group B - My Pick
1% Canada vs Bosnia and Herzegovina to draw at 27c
OR
1% Canada not to defeat Bosnia and Herzegovina at 46c
OR
Some combination of the above
I'm going to keep this super brief as my wife's parents are visiting and as they are Bosnian we will be cheering for Bosnia and Herzegovina tonight. Basically what this comes down to is how close Bosnia will be able to keep the game against a Canada team that is technically very strong but can struggle to convert possession dominance into goals. We have seen this over quite a few friendlies where they just haven't quite had that cutting edge to put teams away. They face a Bosnian team that qualified via the European playoffs and beat both Wales and Italy on penalties.
Bosnia have been doing better under Sergej Barbarez who took an underperforming team with some ego issues and built a team with a tough defence but with young attacking talent coming through. What is notable is they don't panic when they go behind. They conceded an early goal to Italy in the playoff final and they amped up their attack but without leaving themselves particularly exposed in the process. Italy went down to ten men, Bosnia equalised and they kept their composure on penalties to reach their second World Cup.
Historically teams from the Balkans when they develop a sense of coherence tend to be hard to break down and aren't volatile with respect to changes in the game state. If they go behind against Canada tonight I would still give them a good chance of snatching an equaliser. Italy may not be the force they once were but knocking them out is still no mean feat and the manner in which they did so is the kind of tactical setup that can make it difficult for a team like Canada to score. Today's weather in Toronto is mid 20s Celsius and moderate humidity but these conditions are not uncommon in the Balkans during the summer time.
I got a partial fill for the draw at 26c but that line has since moved up a bit I like Canada not to win at 46c but in tournament football, there is a stronger game state dependence than in club football which can put upwards pressure on draw probabilities. So feel free to mix these positions if you like to manage exposure and we'll see how it goes.
https://www.sherdog.com/news/articles/1/Preview-UFC-Freedom-250-Topuria-vs-Gaethje-201493
UFC Freedom 250 preview & betting recommendations.
Pic is of my parlay play, also, I want Pereira to win, but could absolutely see Gane getting it done as he is a very fast HW.
My Barnes MLB F5 MLB System Using Only Kalshi.
I have been working on an AI algorithm based on Barnes system which prioritizes starting pitchers matchups.
The basic concept of my algorithm is to find where a starting pitcher has a massive advantage in the F5.
Previously I would exclude big market teams based on Barnes season total wins, or exclude teams based on season win totals.
But then I started looking at Kalshi betting lines for F5.
The highly juiced F5 lines on Sportbooks compared to the value on Kalshi lines looked great.
Betting the big market teams suddenly looked more promising using Kalshi only for F5 bets.
Not just the big market teams, but every F5 bet has better odds than anything you can find at any sports book.
Examples for tonight’s games. Dodgers, Mets and Atlanta were the top plays. Plays which I would never look at previously which ended up being the top three plays.
Dodger F5 won
Mets F5 push
Braves F5 postponed.
1-0-2 the record for today
First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.
Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe.