SportsPicks
Politics • Investing & Finance • Sports
All your sports information for those investing Vegas-style in the outcomes of sports games. Predicting games against the line in all sports, especially football, American and English style.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

World Cup Groups K & L - My Picks

1% DR Congo +1.5 vs Portugal at 46c (good to 52c)
100 contracts Croatia +1.5 at 69c (good to 73c) and 100 contracts Croatia not to win at 82c (good to 85c) (this requires more capital but it's net exposure of $51 so scale this to 1% of bankroll if necessary)
0.5% No on Both Teams to Score at 53c (good to 56c)
0.5% Under 2.5 goals at 54c (good to 57c)

You may notice that I've included a synthetic position above. It's basically Croatia to either draw or lose by no more than one goal. I've given it in prediction market form but if you want to use a regular bookmaker just convert 100 contracts into $100 total payout including original stake. The two positions require more capital but at least one is guaranteed to hit and profit would come from both hitting at the same time.

Portugal vs DR Congo - We've seen a trend of big underdogs open against top teams by playing a tight, disciplined defensive unit with various degrees of transition threat and keeping the game close. I consider this match to be likely to play out in a similar manner. Portugal have an enormous amount of attacking talent with Bruno Fernandes coming off the season of his life, breaking the Premier League assist record and Vitinha winning the Champions League. They are led up top by Cristiano Ronaldo, now 41 years old. DR Congo are a physically athletic team that is capable of explosive counterattacking moves and they will be looking to take advantage of Portugal pushing their full backs high up the pitch. It is well known that Ronaldo is not the same physical specimen he used to be and DR Congo's defence has more than enough athleticism to match his runs.

The Congolese defence include Axel Tuanzebe and Aaron Wan Bissaka, both formerly of Manchester United. Wan Bissaka was often criticised for his lack of offensive guile but as defender, he was better than many top full backs. One of his specialties was intricately timed tackling that would reach around an opponent's legs and take the ball off the tip of his toe. Portugal have been a consistent winning team but they have not been consistently blowing out opponents and they had trouble in qualifying against Ireland who they only beat very late in Lisbon and lost 2-0 to in Dublin. DR Congo on the other hand have won most of their games this year and generally when they have lost it's been by a goal.

DR Congo's preferred game state is one where Portugal recycle possession but don't have the cutting edge to turn it into end product. If Ronaldo is not able to break through the Congolese defence Portugal do have other creators who can fashion chances but as Cape Verde showed against Spain, you can have all the possession in the world but if you don't have space to leverage it into a chance, it's very difficult to take advantage of it. My question mark would be do Portugal have enough physicality to force DR Congo into more than just placing their bodies in front of the ball all night. That's where Ronaldo not being in his physical prime anymore can make things difficult for Portugal.

England vs Croatia - This is Thomas Tuchel's first real test as England manger having led them through qualification without conceding a single goal. England generally dominate qualification but tournament football is where they have traditionally struggled as there's no one united English way of playing. You generally have players who play in different tactical systems and star players who often overlap in function and previous England managers have struggled to integrate them into a cohesive system. Tuchel is attempting to implement a club style system at national level but that's easier said than done when you don't have a longstanding set of methodologies that players grew up playing, as you have with Austria and Ralf Rangnick.

My big concern is that Tuchel is trying to fit the players to his system rather than the other way around and his squad selection has progressively reduced his options rather than expand them, which can be seen with his omissions of Harry Maguire and Trent Alexander Arnold, two experienced defenders who both bring attacking threat late into the game. England have been playing with more control under Tuchel but they are still reliant on Harry Kane and Jude Bellingham to create chances. If plan A isn't working late into the game I am sceptical of how likely their plan B is. England under Tuchel have undertaken extensive climate preparations to deal with the hot, humid North American summer weather but today's game takes place in the AT&T stadium in Dallas, which you will be very aware is a climate controlled stadium with air conditioning, so I don't expect there to be any appreciable edge from England's climate preparations.

Croatia meanwhile is a team that has overachieved expectations over the last decade through elite game state management mediated by players like Luka Modric who know how to modulate the pace of the game and force their opponents to play the game at Croatia's preferred pace. The Croatian team is older now and so they don't have that same physical execution edge that they used to but they still have a strong defence and Luka Modric at 41 is still playing as a starter in Serie A. I do lean England to take the win but I don't think it will be straightforward. I think both teams are going to want to try and control the game, Tuchel because control is a large part of his risk management philosophy and Croatia because it allows them to manage the game state to their advantage. If one team takes the lead I can see it being very difficult for the other team to score an equaliser. 1-1 is a plausible result but so is 2-0 England with the second goal coming late on.

I suspect that this game will come down to a small number of key moments, which would tend away from the game being a blowout or two teams exchanging blows. If England lead I wouldn't be surprised if Croatia have more of the ball but don't create much with it. Even with Chelsea Tuchel didn't go for domination of the ball like Pep or Klopp did and so his Chelsea team were often willing to sacrifice possession if they could manage their opponent's possession into sterile recycling of the ball. Tuchel is not generally a manager who takes a large amount of risks and so his Champions League teams did on occasion struggle to break down structured teams. Croatia in Euro 2024 did concede some late goals as they weren't the same side as they used to be so I wouldn't be surprised if England do fashion an edge late in the game but overall I am not expecting a game that's high on volatility. Both these teams are comfortable with caution and with the winner well positioned to win the group, I don't think either team is going to be going gung ho on a first pass.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Barnes Brothers MEGA World Cup Preview
01:57:40
Barnes Brothers Do It Again!!!!

What if someone would have told you that Tottenham Spurs would AVOID RELEGATION by the "skin of their teeth"??

Would You Listen?!?!

IF YOU DIDN'T..... NEXT TIME YOU WILL BECAUSE ALL THE BARNES BROTHERS DO IS WIN BABY WIN!!!!

00:08:15
Another SportsPicks Winner!!!!

Arsenal Takes Home EPL Crown.... And The Barnes Brothers Told Ya It Would Happen!!

00:08:22
SEC Preview Podcast

A full breakdown of every team in the SEC, including talent analysis, coordinator concern, and schedule forecasts, with win total expectations. Enjoy!

SEC Preview Podcast
Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB

March Madness final four recap and Championship preview...

Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
Live Chat
LIVE CHAT FOR 2026

Now open!

MLB F5 SYSTEM

June 18, 2026 — Early Games Only (3 games)

Strongest edge on the slate: MIN F5 (Joe Ryan dominates).

Best value plays: MIN F5 (S-Tier) and CLE F5 (A-Tier).

Tiered Plays

S-Tier (Diff ≥ 2.50)

• MIN F5 (Joe Ryan over Jack Leiter) — Diff 3.7 | 70%+
A-Tier (Diff 1.75–2.49)

• CLE F5 (Parker Messick over Shane Drohan) — Diff 1.8 | 61–63%

B-Tier (Diff 1.00–1.74)
• BOS F5 (Sonny Gray over Trey Yesavage) — Diff 1.2 | 57–60%

Top 3 Ranked Plays

1. MIN F5 (Joe Ryan) — S-Tier
Elite 2026 metrics + heavy recent weighting vs struggling Leiter.

2. CLE F5 (Parker Messick) — A-Tier
Outstanding 2026 numbers (low ERA/WHIP) in 14 starts.

3. BOS F5 (Sonny Gray) — B-Tier
Veteran edge in a closer matchup.

Key Notes

• MIN F5 is the clear #1 edge today — massive profile gap.

• Messick continues to look like one of the best young arms in the league.

• All three games have clear pitching advantages per the model.

Pure pitching model — No odds or market data used.

MLB F5 SYSTEM

Thursday, June 18, 2026

No top tier games were the rest of the day. Soriano is TBD

(Remaining games only – early slate already started)

A-Tier Plays (Diff 1.75–2.49)

• LAA F5 (Soriano over Jump) — Diff 2.4 | 64–66%
• SEA F5 (Woo over Baz) — Diff 2.4 | 64–66%
• KC F5 (Cameron over Liberatore) — Diff 1.9 | 61–63%

Strongest Edge on Slate

LAA F5 (Soriano) — Best overall profile + strong sample (15 GS) and solid Diff.
Close 2nd: SEA F5 (Woo) — Elite underlying metrics (FIP 3.26) + home boost.

Daily Top 5 Ranked Plays

1. LAA F5 (Soriano) — A-Tier, dominant 2026 profile
2. SEA F5 (Woo) — A-Tier, best underlying numbers on slate
3. KC F5 (Cameron) — A-Tier, clean home edge
4. NYM F5 (Manaea) — B-Tier, clear advantage vs struggling Nola
5. NYY F5 (Weathers) — C-Tier, narrow home/K-BB edge
Notes: No S-Tier edges on the remaining slate. BAL@SEA starts at 4:10 PM ET (very soon). Pure pitching model — no odds or market data used.

post photo preview
OFFICIAL PICKS: Midterms, 2026
House Elections Projections
 
The House tends to be more responsive to midterm dynamics, but, like the Senate, swings hard in elections where some combination of the Four Factors are present -- cost of living crisis or recession; war; major scandal; betrayal or down-ballot realignment. A fun map to use is this simulator, which takes partisan averages from existing models, and plugs in the map based on your adjustment of the generic ballot edge for one party or another. https://globalelectionsimulator.com/#/usa-house
 
Historic Norms: When a combination of the Four Factors are present, this is the kind of swing you get:
1930: 52 seat swing
1946: 55 seat swing
1958: 49 seat swing
1974: 49 seat swing
1994: 54 seat swing
2006: 31 seat swing
 
2026 PROJECTIONS

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Barnes Betting Report: Senate 2026

First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.

Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe. 

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Barnes Betting Report: Massie Deep Dive
Based on historic turnout patterns in contested GOP primaries, early voting to date, and a range of polling sources, this is my updated set of forecasts for the Kentucky 4th Congressional District GOP primary. 
 

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals