MLB F5 SYSTEM UPDATE
Ran algorithm again for the late games
Updated top five
Cleveland Indians F5 still the top way
1. S-Tier Plays (Diff ≥ 2.50)
• CLE F5 (Williams over Sproat) — Diff 3.8 | 70%+
• NYY F5 (Rodón over Kay) — Diff 2.8 | 70%+
• WSN F5 (Littell over Avila) — Diff 2.8 | 70%+
• MIA F5 (Alcantara over Painter) — Diff 2.6 | 70%+
• PIT F5 (Ashcraft over Civale) — Diff 2.5 | 70%+
2. A-Tier Plays (Diff 1.75–2.49)
• ARI F5 (E. Rodríguez over Aldegheri) — Diff 2.1 | 64-66%
• CHC F5 (Assad over Sullivan) — Diff 2.0 | 64-66%
• DET F5 (Mize over Lambert) — Diff 1.5 (borderline A/B) | 61-63%
• LAD F5 (Ohtani over McClanahan) — Diff 1.6 | 61-63%
3. Underdog Pitching Edges
• BAL — Bradish carries strong 2026 metrics and volume; slight road edge in a close matchup vs Kirby.
• SD — Canning holds a minor metrics edge over Leahy despite both being below-average options.
• SF — Ray’s veteran profile gives a tiny lean in a near-even game vs Ritchie.
4. Strongest Edge On Slate
Strongest Play — CLE F5 (Gavin Williams). Williams posts elite 2026 numbers (top-tier ERA/WHIP/K-BB in the Fangraphs chart) with high GS volume and strong recent form against a weak Brandon Sproat (poor metrics, below-average K-BB and WHIP). Large Diff and high-confidence sample.
Close second: NYY F5 (Carlos Rodón) — Rodón’s strong underlying metrics and home start vs a struggling Anthony Kay create a near-identical large Diff; excellent process edge.
5. Daily Top 5 Ranked Plays (by Diff + profile strength + sample confidence)
1. CLE F5 (Williams) — S-Tier, elite 2026 form + weakest opposing starter on slate
2. NYY F5 (Rodón) — S-Tier, strong metrics + favorable home matchup vs weak Kay
3. PIT F5 (Ashcraft) — S-Tier, consistent high-end 2026 production vs below-average Civale
4. MIA F5 (Alcantara) — S-Tier, volume leader with solid metrics vs struggling Painter
5. WSN F5 (Littell) — S-Tier, clear metrics advantage vs very weak Avila (low GS/poor ratios)
MLB F5 Edge Scanner v10.0 | June 17, 2026
Pure pitching model — No odds or market data used.
MLB F5 MLB System Kalshi
Cleveland Indians F5
strongest play
1. S-Tier Plays (Diff ≥ 2.50)
• SD F5 (Rodriguez over Leahy) — Diff ~3.3 | 70%+
• MIA F5 (Alcantara over Painter) — Diff ~3.6 | 70%+
• BOS F5 (Bennett over Scherzer) — Diff ~3.2 | 70%+
• CLE F5 (Williams over Sproat) — Diff ~4.2 | 70%+
2. A-Tier Plays (Diff 1.75–2.49)
• LAD F5 (Ohtani over McClanahan) — Diff 2.3 | 64–66%
• DET F5 (Mize over Lambert) — Diff 1.8 | 61–63%
• NYY F5 (Rodón over Kay) — Diff 1.8 | 61–63%
3. Underdog Pitching Edges
• BOS — Bennett significantly better than struggling Scherzer (strong underdog-side advantage)
• SD — Rodriguez dominant small-sample profile vs Leahy
• MIA — Alcantara clear step up vs Painter
• CLE — Williams far superior to Sproat
4. Strongest Edge On Slate
CLE F5 (Williams) — Largest Diff (~4.2) with established sample for Williams and clear weakness in Sproat.
Close second: LAD F5 (Ohtani) for elite ceiling + home context.
5. Daily Top 5 Ranked Plays ...
First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.
Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe.