SportsPicks
Politics • Investing & Finance • Sports
All your sports information for those investing Vegas-style in the outcomes of sports games. Predicting games against the line in all sports, especially football, American and English style.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

World Cup Groups C & D Round Two - My Picks

1% Scotland and Morocco to draw at 27c (good to 30c)
1% Brazil -2.5 vs Haiti at 51c (good to 55c)
1% Turkey to beat Paraguay at 47c (good to 52c)

We've reached that early stage of the tournament where everyone has played at least once with some teams already having played twice. This is when teams become a little bit more clear on what needs to be done as well as what's to be avoided so there tends to be a little more calculated risk taking now. Let's look at tonight's games.

Scotland vs Morocco - until last week's game against Brazil I believe that the betting markets were pricing in Morocco under their previous manager Walid Regragui, under whom they played a very conservative, defensive style where they could keep it tight against big teams and hit them on the break. They are now managed by Mohamed Ouahbi, who won the U20 World Cup with Morocco. He has brought a more aggressive high pressing style to Morocco while still allowing them to play more defensively when the situation calls for it. After their draw against Brazil, the line moved in Morocco's favour against Scotland, now being favoured by about three quarters of a goal.

I believe Morocco will present a very stubborn obstacle in the knockout stages once again but in the meantime they do have to play Scotland and this is where I do see potential for the game to end in a draw. Scotland is a team which is generally more comfortable being the underdog than the favourite as their strengths are more physical strength, defensive organisation and set pieces rather than dictating the pace of the game and breaking teams down. Morocco's high press was effective against Brazil in the early stages because Brazil were trying to implement a patient passing game and that's when high presses tend to be the most disruptive. They are not as disruptive against more compact physical units that are able to get bodies in the way of crucial attacking laneways. Morocco are generally very disciplined at the back but Scotland do pose a set piece threat so I do think there may be some gravity around the draw for this game.

Brazil vs Haiti - Brazil got off to slow start against Morocco, being disorientated by their high press. This is the kind of game where under previous management Brazil could very well have lost sticking to their more traditional methods but their manager Carlo Ancelotti made quick in game adjustments to tighten up the game. Brazil's lack of full back width made it more difficult for them to break down the Moroccan defence which was more compact when defending and there is only so much the likes of Vinicius Jr can do on their own.

Haiti meanwhile play a much more volatile brand of football where they are willing to play and end to end game and this was evident in their game against Scotland. Against stronger teams they please more conservatively but they generally don't go fully defensive against them. This is the kind of game where Brazil's wing forwards are more likely to get away without needing intricate wing play with full backs to generate chances and Brazil culturally are not the kind o team to rest on their laurels when they have a lead against a weaker team. Ancelotti will now doubt make adjustments for this game as like many Italian managers, he plans for the game that is likely to happen, which includes tweaks specific to the opponent. Since the top of Group C may come down to goal difference, if Brazil are able to find a consistent attacking edge over Haiti, I expect them to keep iterating it to give them the best chance of finishing above Morocco on goal difference if they need it.

Turkey vs Paraguay Turkey lost 2-0 to Australia in a game where they had lots of shots and chances but just couldn't put them away. As a team Turkey is strong at putting together sustained attacks but they can sometimes lack patience which can let them down against more disciplined units and that had a part in them losing to Australia. From an xG point of view they did generated more than Australia which suggests that their issue is not chance creation, it's taking those chances while minimising exposure to the other team's attacks. I would expect Turkey to create their fair share of opportunities against Paraguay and I think they will be in a more comfortable position to dictate the pace against Paraguay who haven't shown the same amount of offensive threat that Australia posed.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Barnes Brothers MEGA World Cup Preview
01:57:40
Barnes Brothers Do It Again!!!!

What if someone would have told you that Tottenham Spurs would AVOID RELEGATION by the "skin of their teeth"??

Would You Listen?!?!

IF YOU DIDN'T..... NEXT TIME YOU WILL BECAUSE ALL THE BARNES BROTHERS DO IS WIN BABY WIN!!!!

00:08:15
Another SportsPicks Winner!!!!

Arsenal Takes Home EPL Crown.... And The Barnes Brothers Told Ya It Would Happen!!

00:08:22
SEC Preview Podcast

A full breakdown of every team in the SEC, including talent analysis, coordinator concern, and schedule forecasts, with win total expectations. Enjoy!

SEC Preview Podcast
Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB

March Madness final four recap and Championship preview...

Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
LIVE CHAT FOR 2026

Now open!

✅ MLB F5 Edge Scanner v10.0 – 8 PM Slate (June 19)

S-Tier Plays (Diff ≥ 2.50):
• CLE F5 (Bibee) — Diff 2.7 | 70%+
• PIT F5 (Chandler) — Diff 2.5 | 67–69%
Strongest Edge: CLE F5 (Bibee) — cleanest matchup on the late slate.

A-Tier: TEX F5 (deGrom) — Diff 1.9 | 61–63%
Pure pitching model (no odds/market data). Research & backtesting focused.
Full details + all metrics in the thread. Who’s riding CLE or PIT F5 tonight? 👀

#MLB #F5 #MLBPicks #SportsBetting

MLB F5 SYSTEM

June 19, 2026

Strongest play on the early evening games is Detroit Tigers F5

1. S-Tier Plays (Diff ≥ 2.50
)
• DET F5 (Skubal over Eisert) — Diff 3.4 | 70%+
• NYY F5 (Schlittler over Lowder) — Diff 2.9 | 70%+

2. A-Tier Plays (Diff 1.75–2.49)
• MIL F5 (Misiorowski over Pérez) — Diff 2.3 | 64–66%

3. Underdog Pitching Edges
• WSH — Poulin carries a slight edge in a low-confidence, low-Diff spot vs. Jax (spot/bulk role). Small sample but clean recent results.

• MIA — Bachar’s small-sample effectiveness gives a narrow underdog-side nod in a close C-Tier game.

4. Strongest Edge On Slate
Strongest Play — DET F5 (Skubal). Largest Diff on the slate (3.4), elite 2026 metrics from Skubal (low FIP, excellent command/ratios, proven sample), and very weak opposing starter in Eisert. Highest conviction and profile strength.

Close second: NYY F5 (Schlittler) — Nearly as large a gap (2.9) with Schlittler’s Cy Young-caliber 2026 numbers and 15 GS of dominance.

post photo preview
OFFICIAL PICKS: Midterms, 2026
House Elections Projections
 
The House tends to be more responsive to midterm dynamics, but, like the Senate, swings hard in elections where some combination of the Four Factors are present -- cost of living crisis or recession; war; major scandal; betrayal or down-ballot realignment. A fun map to use is this simulator, which takes partisan averages from existing models, and plugs in the map based on your adjustment of the generic ballot edge for one party or another. https://globalelectionsimulator.com/#/usa-house
 
Historic Norms: When a combination of the Four Factors are present, this is the kind of swing you get:
1930: 52 seat swing
1946: 55 seat swing
1958: 49 seat swing
1974: 49 seat swing
1994: 54 seat swing
2006: 31 seat swing
 
2026 PROJECTIONS

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Barnes Betting Report: Senate 2026

First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.

Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe. 

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Barnes Betting Report: Massie Deep Dive
Based on historic turnout patterns in contested GOP primaries, early voting to date, and a range of polling sources, this is my updated set of forecasts for the Kentucky 4th Congressional District GOP primary. 
 

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals