SportsPicks
Politics • Investing & Finance • Sports
All your sports information for those investing Vegas-style in the outcomes of sports games. Predicting games against the line in all sports, especially football, American and English style.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

World Cup Last 32 USA vs Bosnia & Herzegovina - My Pick (Optional)

1% Bosnia & Herzegovina +1.5 against the USA at 51c (good to 56c)

Alright, a very quick write up before tonight's game between the USA and Bosnia & Herzegovina. Full disclosure, I am cheering for Bosnia tonight as my wife is from there and I already have USA futures from the official picks to reach various knockout stages so I am trying to hedge out a little bit of profit and create a small middle in the process. That is why I've marked this game's pick as optional. I am a little bit uncertain about how this game will play out so I'm erring on the side of taking a bit of net risk off the table.

Generally speaking, the USA have been very good at this tournament so far. Mauricio Pochettino has spent a lot of time experimenting to find the best configuration for the USA team and it has paid off in the group stages with two wins against Paraguay and Australia to win the group D with a game to spare. The USA then lost their third group stage game to Turkey in a match where there was no need to risk any injuries or suspensions to players already on a yellow card. The USA are a very strong athletic team and their attacks have had a coherent flow with players knowing exactly where their options are when they receive the ball.

Bosnia and Herzegovina meanwhile finished third in Group B behind Switzerland and Canada on four points, thus going through as one of the eight best third place teams. They drew with Canada in their first game before losing to Switzerland in a game they stayed in for a long time but snowballed after a red card while they were 1-0 down. Bosnia then beat Qatar 3-1 in the final game to secure qualification.

In tonight's game I do expect the USA to press hard and make it difficult for Bosnia to mount attacks. Yet Bosnia are a team that is very comfortable with making games ugly and their two playoff games to qualify for the World Cup were both games they won on penalties, including one to deny Italy a chance to compete in the tournament. In spite of the 4-1 defeat to Switzerland, Bosnia don't panic when they go behind and are comfortable with gradually pushing for an entry back into the game. They are strong on set pieces and Edin Džeko even at 40 only needs a small edge of space to score.

The USA despite the progress they have made under Pochettino have still shown some vulnerability in defence. It would be easy to say that the USA's defeat to Turkey can be explained away by saying that it was the third game with the group already won so it doesn't matter, but the mechanisms by which Turkey came back into the game are not new. When defending leads late in the game, the USA can be susceptible to chaos in defence and this was something which came up in the pre tournament friendlies. I do see the case for the USA being able to open up a lead and then expand upon it. Where I am a little bit more sceptical is that Bosnia won't be able to close the gap at some point. It may be pulling a goal back from 2-0 to make it a nervy finish, it might even be a late equaliser. If the game goes to extra time I would still give the USA a strong chance but I would be a little more bearish on their chances if this match goes to penalties because that is exactly the kind of exchange Bosnia is comfortable with. They are a team that has made big progress under Sergej Barbarez and I don't expect them to go down without a fight.

So I think USA futures still look good but this one has potential to be tighter than the betting markets are anticipating, so we'll see how it goes.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Barnes Brothers MEGA World Cup Preview
01:57:40
Barnes Brothers Do It Again!!!!

What if someone would have told you that Tottenham Spurs would AVOID RELEGATION by the "skin of their teeth"??

Would You Listen?!?!

IF YOU DIDN'T..... NEXT TIME YOU WILL BECAUSE ALL THE BARNES BROTHERS DO IS WIN BABY WIN!!!!

00:08:15
Another SportsPicks Winner!!!!

Arsenal Takes Home EPL Crown.... And The Barnes Brothers Told Ya It Would Happen!!

00:08:22
SEC Preview Podcast

A full breakdown of every team in the SEC, including talent analysis, coordinator concern, and schedule forecasts, with win total expectations. Enjoy!

SEC Preview Podcast
Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB

March Madness final four recap and Championship preview...

Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
LIVE CHAT FOR 2026

Now open!

🔥 July 1, 2026 Degenerate Special 🔥

Afternoon & evening slate locked with high-K arms! 🔥

Your Locked Open Bets (placed & pending):

1. 3-Leg Same Game Parlay+ — Odds: -105
• Paul Skenes 6+ Strikeouts — PIT Pirates @ PHI Phillies 6:41 PM ET
• Zack Wheeler 6+ Strikeouts — PHI Phillies @ NY Mets (or matchup shown)
• Max Meyer 5+ Strikeouts — MIA Marlins @ COL Rockies 8:41 PM ET

#MLBProps #StrikeoutBets #DegenerateMode 🤑⚾

World Cup Last 32 England vs DR Congo - My Pick

1% DR Congo +1.5 at 51c (good to 55c)

The story of England's World Cup so far has been early promise in their opening game against Croatia followed by a dull back down to Earth in their next two games against Ghana and Panama. Despite Thomas Tuchel's team qualifying for the World Cup without conceding a single goal in the process, there was a sense of uneasiness about England this time, not because they lacked talent, both at squad and managerial level, but rather because still nobody quite knows who England are. Gareth Southgate resigned after losing the Euro 2024 final after another campaign where England were very solid at the back but lacking the ability to raise the temperature of the game and find a cutting edge in high pressure situations. Thomas Tuchel was hired to bring in some of the methods that worked for successful club teams, but club methods require the ability to assemble the right players and work with them weak in and ...

post photo preview
OFFICIAL PICKS: Midterms, 2026
House Elections Projections
 
The House tends to be more responsive to midterm dynamics, but, like the Senate, swings hard in elections where some combination of the Four Factors are present -- cost of living crisis or recession; war; major scandal; betrayal or down-ballot realignment. A fun map to use is this simulator, which takes partisan averages from existing models, and plugs in the map based on your adjustment of the generic ballot edge for one party or another. https://globalelectionsimulator.com/#/usa-house
 
Historic Norms: When a combination of the Four Factors are present, this is the kind of swing you get:
1930: 52 seat swing
1946: 55 seat swing
1958: 49 seat swing
1974: 49 seat swing
1994: 54 seat swing
2006: 31 seat swing
 
2026 PROJECTIONS

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Barnes Betting Report: Senate 2026

First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.

Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe. 

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Barnes Betting Report: Massie Deep Dive
Based on historic turnout patterns in contested GOP primaries, early voting to date, and a range of polling sources, this is my updated set of forecasts for the Kentucky 4th Congressional District GOP primary. 
 

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals