MiracleManDan's AI Baseball 7/9/26
Experimental
New and updated angles fired today. New backtesting results:
Updated live policy for max robust profit: edge ≥ 3%, price ≤ +175.
Current vs new Policy
OLD edge≥5%, uncapped - N 1247 WR 41.2% Flat ROI +5.5% Flat net +68u Sized Net +171u
NEW edge≥3%, ≤+175 - N 1333 WR 46.1% Flat ROI +6.9% Flat net +92u Sized Net +154u
Max sized (3%, uncapped) - N 1685 WR 42.4% Flat ROI +4.9% Flat net +82u Sized Net +201u
Uncapped 3% wins on sized units only by keeping long dogs — rejected.
Cap at +175 is the best flat profit with higher WR.
Bottom line - fg_high_edge_underdog as implemented is projected at +154u for the season. Let's see if we can hit 75u for the second half (theoretical, I am not yet prepared to plunge on bet sizing).
f5 policies remain unchanged.
When both F5 an FG fire for the same game I am taking the one with the highest edge. Will get these combined, but want to refactor the output from csv into a DB first.
MLB F5 2026 — Play Analysis
========================================
Generated: 2026-07-09 18:42 UTC
CSV: outputs/mlbf5/bets-2026-07-09.csv
Model: moneyline_blend (warehouse xG when available)
Scan: 7 fixtures → 1 actionable plays
ACTIONABLE PLAYS (1)
1. St. Louis Cardinals vs Milwaukee Brewers
Pick: St. Louis Cardinals (H) | F5 MONEY | FD +106
Kickoff: 07/09/26 19:46:0 (G15)
Starters: St. Louis Cardinals Andre Pallante (2.87, 1.05) | Milwaukee Brewers Logan Henderson (2.74, 1.04) | SP ERA delta -0.13 (away-home)
Angle: Home pick with acceptable SP matchup and home brand advantage
Model: 52.4% win | Fair -110 | Edge +3.8%
Units: 1 | ACTIONABLE
Ratings: home=4.79 away=3.71 | form 0.60/0.20 | mu=+1.12
Notes: H: Andre Pallante (2.87, 1.05) A: Logan Henderson (2.74, 1.04) Model: 52.4% Edge: 3.8% Form: +1.12 Angle: Home pick with acceptable SP matchup and home brand advantage
MLB Full Game 2026 — Play Analysis
========================================
Generated: 2026-07-09 18:42 UTC
CSV: outputs/mlbfg/bets-2026-07-09.csv
Model: moneyline_blend (warehouse xG when available)
Scan: 13 fixtures → 8 actionable plays (4 today)
ACTIONABLE PLAYS (4)
1. Cincinnati Reds vs Philadelphia Phillies
Pick: Cincinnati Reds (H) | GAME MONEY | FD +138
Kickoff: 07/09/26 19:11:0 (G15)
Starters: Cincinnati Reds Brady Singer (3.29, 1.24) | Philadelphia Phillies Jesús Luzardo (1.78, 1.12) | SP ERA delta -1.51 (away-home)
Angle: High-edge full-game underdog
Model: 47.2% win | Fair +112 | Edge +5.2%
Units: 1 | ACTIONABLE
Ratings: home=3.96 away=4.54 | form 0.30/0.50 | mu=-0.54
Notes: H: Brady Singer (3.29, 1.24) A: Jesús Luzardo (1.78, 1.12) Model: 47.2% Edge: 5.2% Form: -0.54 Angle: High-edge full-game underdog
2. Miami Marlins vs Seattle Mariners
Pick: Miami Marlins (H) | GAME MONEY | FD +112
Kickoff: 07/09/26 18:41:0 (G15)
Starters: Miami Marlins Janson Junk (7.00, 1.59) | Seattle Mariners Bryce Miller (1.71, 0.54) | SP ERA delta -5.29 (away-home)
Angle: High-edge full-game underdog
Model: 51.9% win | Fair -108 | Edge +4.7%
Units: 1 | ACTIONABLE
Ratings: home=4.60 away=3.90 | form 0.70/0.50 | mu=+0.74
Notes: H: Janson Junk (7.00, 1.59) A: Bryce Miller (1.71, 0.54) Model: 51.9% Edge: 4.7% Form: +0.74 Angle: High-edge full-game underdog
3. San Francisco Giants vs Colorado Rockies
Pick: Colorado Rockies (A) | GAME MONEY | FD +112
Kickoff: 07/09/26 21:46:0 (G15)
Starters: San Francisco Giants TBD | Colorado Rockies Ryan Feltner (4.33, 1.30)
Angle: High-edge full-game underdog
Model: 51.5% win | Fair -106 | Edge +4.4%
Units: 1 | ACTIONABLE
Ratings: home=4.02 away=4.48 | form 0.40/0.50 | mu=-0.42
Notes: H: TBD A: Ryan Feltner (4.33, 1.30) Model: 51.5% Edge: 4.4% Form: -0.42 Angle: High-edge full-game underdog
4. St. Louis Cardinals vs Milwaukee Brewers
Pick: St. Louis Cardinals (H) | GAME MONEY | MGM +115
Kickoff: 07/09/26 19:46:0 (G15)
Starters: St. Louis Cardinals Andre Pallante (2.87, 1.05) | Milwaukee Brewers Logan Henderson (2.74, 1.04) | SP ERA delta -0.13 (away-home)
Angle: Home pick with acceptable SP matchup and home brand advantage, High-edge full-game underdog
Model: 50.5% win | Fair -102 | Edge +4.0%
Units: 1 | ACTIONABLE
Ratings: home=4.04 away=4.46 | form 0.50/0.70 | mu=-0.38
Notes: H: Andre Pallante (2.87, 1.05) A: Logan Henderson (2.74, 1.04) Model: 50.5% Edge: 4.0% Form: -0.38 Angle: Home pick with acceptable SP matchup and home brand advantage, High-edge full-game underdog
World Cup Quarter Finals France vs Morocco - My Pick
1% Morocco not to lose vs France at 39c (good to 45c)
OR
1% Morocco +1.5 vs France at 65c (good to 69c)
Alright sorry I haven't been posting my picks in a while, the sheer volume of games means I'm always just running out of time for the next one and as it happens I'm off to the pub for this game so I'm going to keep this super brief.
Morocco have become a very stubborn yet adaptable team under Mohamed Ouahbi. They are capable of executing a high press or defending deep depending on what the situation demands and often within the same game. They have had challenges to present to every team they've faced and so far no opponent has had a full answer for it.
France have been strong this tournament but their team is very top heavy. Against Paraguay France struggled to create chances against a team that didn't give them the open space between lines they like to create at will. Morocco will be the first team that France encounters this ...
First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.
Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe.