SportsPicks
Politics • Investing & Finance • Sports
All your sports information for those investing Vegas-style in the outcomes of sports games. Predicting games against the line in all sports, especially football, American and English style.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?

World Cup Quarter Final Norway vs England - My Picks

1% England to win vs Norway in 90 minutes at 50c (good to 55c)
0.5% Over 2.5 goals at 58c (good to 63c)
0.5% Both teams to score at 62c (good to 68c)
0.5% Over 9.5 corners at 46c (good to 56c)

The first of tonight's two quarter finals features a matchup going all the way back to the dark ages, Norway vs England. Norway come into this fixture off the back of a 2-1 win over Brazil, in which Haaland scored two goals before Neymar pulled one back from a penalty, the second penalty Brazil had that game. England meanwhile inflicted one of the very few defeats Mexico have ever suffered at the Estadio Azteca, holding on for a 3-2 win after having played most of the second half with ten men after Jarrell Quansah's red card for a studs up challenge on Mexico's Jesus Gallardo. Both teams have been involved in some explosive, transition heavy games.

I would consider tonight's game to follow in the volatility of these teams' previous games. England under Gareth Southgate were generally very conservative and played passively a lot of the time. One of the big question marks about Thomas Tuchel is whether he would be able to raise England's ceiling while safeguarding their floor. At club level his sides have been very effective in tournaments but not always showing cutting edge against more defensive sides. In this tournament Tuchel has shown that he is very willing to embrace open and volatile games the way he often did at club level. Against Croatia and Mexico England were effectively able to use their athletic skill to strike at both on the counterattack. Against Ghana, Panama and DR Congo, England's ability to break down more disciplined units was tested much more and against Ghana, they didn't score at all.

Norway meanwhile has been the team that has played without pressure in this World Cup, being willing to take each game as it comes and enjoy it while it lasts. They have been willing to attack quickly up the pitch when they win the ball and they have not always needed many chances for Haaland to get on the scoresheet. This is also an unusual match at international level in that many of Norway's players play in the Premier League so quite a few of those playing tonight will know each other from club level. Most of those who don't play in the Premier League play in the Norwegian Eliteserien, particularly Bodø/Glimt, who made it to the last 16 of the Champions League and were in a very strong position to reach the quarter finals before a big loss to Sporting Lisbon in the second leg.

This is a game where I think the volatility component is higher than it would be for other quarter final matchups. Although Norway had a lot of the ball against Brazil, they were patient with it and didn't play it forward at pace. Brazil were still able to win the ball in midfield and launch quick, direct counterattacks that led to chances. This is similar to how England have created chances against Croatia and Mexico, so I would see the way Norway plays even if it's not necessarily at a fast tempo can still lend itself to shot creation. If they do go behind I don't see the game likely to play out as previous knockout games involving England have where they try to contain the other team without looking to expand their lead. As I have said before, Tuchel is comfortable amping up the volatility in a game, especially if his opponent is initiating it.

Although England have struggled against teams that defend deep and challenge England to express a bit of guile to break them down, I don't think Norway is the team with the profile likely to exploit that. The game may even be uneventful for long stretches and then explode into life int he second half. Both teams have aerial threat that they will look to exploit on corners. With both teams also using wide threat up front this can also lend itself to corners and England at least are not afraid to try some shots from outside the box, which can also lead to corners. Overall this is one of the games I think is less likely to turn into a tactical chess match (though both managers are very good at making in game adjustments) and more likely to be a game where both teams are comfortable playing directly. If this turns into a game settled by physicality, transitions and directness, I think that would favour England as well as a game in which there is a good amount of goals, both teams score and there are quite a few corners too.

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Barnes Brothers: World Cup Preview - Part 2
01:03:49
Barnes Brothers MEGA World Cup Preview
01:57:40
Barnes Brothers Do It Again!!!!

What if someone would have told you that Tottenham Spurs would AVOID RELEGATION by the "skin of their teeth"??

Would You Listen?!?!

IF YOU DIDN'T..... NEXT TIME YOU WILL BECAUSE ALL THE BARNES BROTHERS DO IS WIN BABY WIN!!!!

00:08:15
SEC Preview Podcast

A full breakdown of every team in the SEC, including talent analysis, coordinator concern, and schedule forecasts, with win total expectations. Enjoy!

SEC Preview Podcast
Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB

March Madness final four recap and Championship preview...

Smokehouse Mike's NCAAB
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
Smokehouse Mike's NBA
LIVE CHAT FOR 2026

Now open!

Word is the Swiss seem to be fermenting well, but their defense if full of holes.

MiracleManDan’s AI Baseball 7/11/26

Experimental :

7/11. As a reformed dice player, one of my favorite days.

MLB 2026 — Play Analysis

========================================

Generated: 2026-07-11 17:54 UTC

CSV: outputs/mlbf5/bets-2026-07-11.csv

Model: moneyline_blend (warehouse xG when available)

Scan: 15 fixtures → 1 actionable plays

ACTIONABLE PLAYS (1)


1. Detroit Tigers vs Philadelphia Phillies

   Pick: Detroit Tigers (H) | F5 MONEY | FD +130

   Kickoff: 07/11/26 18:11:0 (G15)

   Starters: Detroit Tigers Casey Mize (2.89, 0.96) | Philadelphia Phillies Cristopher Sánchez (6.33, 1.52) | SP ERA delta +3.44 (away-home)

   Angle: Mid-market dog vs high-brand favorite with non-ace starter

   Model: 52.8% win | Fair -112 | Edge +9.3%

   Units: 3 | ACTIONABLE

   Ratings: home=4.83 away=3.67 | form 0.80/0.40 | mu=+1.20

   Notes: H: Casey Mize (2.89, 0.96) A: Cristopher Sánchez (6.33, 1.52) Model: 52.8% Edge: 9.3% Form: +1.20 Angle: Mid-market dog vs high-brand favorite with non-ace starter

MLB Full Game 2026 — Play ...

post photo preview
OFFICIAL PICKS: Midterms, 2026
House Elections Projections
 
The House tends to be more responsive to midterm dynamics, but, like the Senate, swings hard in elections where some combination of the Four Factors are present -- cost of living crisis or recession; war; major scandal; betrayal or down-ballot realignment. A fun map to use is this simulator, which takes partisan averages from existing models, and plugs in the map based on your adjustment of the generic ballot edge for one party or another. https://globalelectionsimulator.com/#/usa-house
 
Historic Norms: When a combination of the Four Factors are present, this is the kind of swing you get:
1930: 52 seat swing
1946: 55 seat swing
1958: 49 seat swing
1974: 49 seat swing
1994: 54 seat swing
2006: 31 seat swing
 
2026 PROJECTIONS

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
post photo preview
Barnes Betting Report: Senate 2026

First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.

Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe. 

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
Barnes Betting Report: Massie Deep Dive
Based on historic turnout patterns in contested GOP primaries, early voting to date, and a range of polling sources, this is my updated set of forecasts for the Kentucky 4th Congressional District GOP primary. 
 

 

Only for Supporters
To read the rest of this article and access other paid content, you must be a supporter
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals