World Cup Quarter Final Norway vs England - My Picks
1% England to win vs Norway in 90 minutes at 50c (good to 55c)
0.5% Over 2.5 goals at 58c (good to 63c)
0.5% Both teams to score at 62c (good to 68c)
0.5% Over 9.5 corners at 46c (good to 56c)
The first of tonight's two quarter finals features a matchup going all the way back to the dark ages, Norway vs England. Norway come into this fixture off the back of a 2-1 win over Brazil, in which Haaland scored two goals before Neymar pulled one back from a penalty, the second penalty Brazil had that game. England meanwhile inflicted one of the very few defeats Mexico have ever suffered at the Estadio Azteca, holding on for a 3-2 win after having played most of the second half with ten men after Jarrell Quansah's red card for a studs up challenge on Mexico's Jesus Gallardo. Both teams have been involved in some explosive, transition heavy games.
I would consider tonight's game to follow in the volatility of these teams' previous games. ...
MiracleManDan’s AI Baseball 7/11/26
Experimental :
7/11. As a reformed dice player, one of my favorite days.
MLB 2026 — Play Analysis
========================================
Generated: 2026-07-11 17:54 UTC
CSV: outputs/mlbf5/bets-2026-07-11.csv
Model: moneyline_blend (warehouse xG when available)
Scan: 15 fixtures → 1 actionable plays
ACTIONABLE PLAYS (1)
1. Detroit Tigers vs Philadelphia Phillies
Pick: Detroit Tigers (H) | F5 MONEY | FD +130
Kickoff: 07/11/26 18:11:0 (G15)
Starters: Detroit Tigers Casey Mize (2.89, 0.96) | Philadelphia Phillies Cristopher Sánchez (6.33, 1.52) | SP ERA delta +3.44 (away-home)
Angle: Mid-market dog vs high-brand favorite with non-ace starter
Model: 52.8% win | Fair -112 | Edge +9.3%
Units: 3 | ACTIONABLE
Ratings: home=4.83 away=3.67 | form 0.80/0.40 | mu=+1.20
Notes: H: Casey Mize (2.89, 0.96) A: Cristopher Sánchez (6.33, 1.52) Model: 52.8% Edge: 9.3% Form: +1.20 Angle: Mid-market dog vs high-brand favorite with non-ace starter
MLB Full Game 2026 — Play ...
First, four factors dictate whether there is major turnover in the Senate in a midterm election independent of the favorability of the Senate map (due to only one-third of seats being up in any given midterm). Often, as was the case in both 2018 and 2022, is that incumbents are not destined to lose seats, outside of realigning elections in unfavorable maps. This cycle's map favors the GOP, which is why the prediction markets and most forecasters expect a GOP majority in the 2027 Senate. The four factors that prove dangerous to the incumbent party are: first, a recession or cost of living crisis; second, a war; third, a major scandal; and fourth, a sense of betrayal in the voter group that backed the incumbent amongst some portion of their prior electoral coalition. Five midterms feature some combingation of those factors in some significant degree: 1930, 1946, 1958, 1974 and 2006.
Without those factors present in multiple forms, the incumbent party can expect to hold on to seats in states it previously won outside the national margin. When those factors are present, the landscape shifts dramatically. Examining those White House incumbent seats that showed a state-wide election decided by single digits in the prior decade produces the following probabilities: the incumbent White House party lost at least 67% of its incumbent held seats, as much as 85% of its incumbent held seats, and an average of 75% of its incumbent hold seats, rarely upsetting the opposition party in any seat and often losing a surprise or two in seats considered completely safe.